Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 63725 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
agreement cannot modify their joint right under the lease to possession of the vehicle. Whatever
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180633 - 2017-09-21
agreement cannot modify their joint right under the lease to possession of the vehicle. Whatever
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=180633 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
daughter, Carrie.2 Mary also appeals from the court’s order denying her postdisposition motion in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728975 - 2023-11-15
daughter, Carrie.2 Mary also appeals from the court’s order denying her postdisposition motion in which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728975 - 2023-11-15
[PDF]
Frontsheet
the circuit court's denial of the motion to dismiss and its partial grant of a temporary injunction. ¶6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268888 - 2020-10-12
the circuit court's denial of the motion to dismiss and its partial grant of a temporary injunction. ¶6
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=268888 - 2020-10-12
[PDF]
State v. Richard K. Fischer
in denying his suppression motion because he was never read his Miranda 2 rights prior to the taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4840 - 2017-09-19
in denying his suppression motion because he was never read his Miranda 2 rights prior to the taking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4840 - 2017-09-19
State v. Richard K. Fischer
)(a) and 939.05(1) (1999-2000).[1] Fischer argues that the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4840 - 2005-03-31
)(a) and 939.05(1) (1999-2000).[1] Fischer argues that the trial court erred in denying his suppression motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4840 - 2005-03-31
State v. Nathaniel Harris
). The court accepted the parties’ joint recommendation of probation. During the plea and sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13182 - 2005-03-31
). The court accepted the parties’ joint recommendation of probation. During the plea and sentencing hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13182 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Nathaniel Harris
(1984). The court accepted the parties’ joint recommendation of probation. During the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13182 - 2017-09-21
(1984). The court accepted the parties’ joint recommendation of probation. During the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13182 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
attempt to take person into custody, all as a repeater. Taylor moved to withdraw his pleas after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606118 - 2022-12-30
attempt to take person into custody, all as a repeater. Taylor moved to withdraw his pleas after
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=606118 - 2022-12-30
State v. Joshua W.
and transferring him to the custody of the Department of Health and Social Services. Joshua contends that his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9444 - 2005-03-31
and transferring him to the custody of the Department of Health and Social Services. Joshua contends that his plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9444 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
., a minor child at the center of a long and contentious custody/paternity action between the Kramschusters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160965 - 2017-09-21
., a minor child at the center of a long and contentious custody/paternity action between the Kramschusters
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160965 - 2017-09-21