Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 50632 for WA 0812 2782 5310 Daftar Harga Pasang Pintu Kaca Office Murah Temon Kulon Progo.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that the officer did not have probable cause to arrest him, and that regardless, his refusal was lawful because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76641 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] NOTICE
officer shined a spotlight on his car. We agree. We therefore reverse and remand. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35964 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
to the testimony at the suppression hearing, Milwaukee Police Officers Christopher Chu and David Gabbard were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33777 - 2008-08-18

COURT OF APPEALS
court erred by concluding Kreinbring was seized when a police officer shined a spotlight on his car. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35964 - 2009-03-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 2015, a group of Milwaukee police officers were on bicycle patrol in Milwaukee near a gas station
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=240989 - 2019-05-29

[PDF] State v. Thomas A. Lee
officers, Thomas Boaz and Travis Guy. ¶3 Officer Boaz testified that he first spoke to the victim at 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4506 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Anthony Watkins
’ request, this court affirms. BACKGROUND ¶2 On March 28, 2003, City of Milwaukee Police Officers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7642 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
intoxicated. Uttke argues that the officer did not have probable cause to arrest him, and that regardless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76641 - 2012-01-17

[PDF] State v. Eric A. Paarmann
. The officer had observed the vehicle deviate from the center lane on two occasions and was concerned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13294 - 2017-09-21

State v. Gary M. Kratochwill
obtained during an encounter between Kratochwill and a police officer because the officer unreasonably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16065 - 2005-03-31