Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 19830 for inmates search.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 19830 for inmates search.
State v. Robert F. Jones
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
did not have reasonable suspicion that he was armed and therefore the officer’s patdown search
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19063 - 2005-07-18
[PDF]
State v. Stanley Soward
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
against unwarranted search and seizure. We disagree. We hold that the trial court did not err when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2834 - 2017-09-19
State v. Kenneth W. Grothmann
not have probable cause to arrest him, (2) the warrantless search of his vehicle was not consensual, (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19378 - 2005-08-23
not have probable cause to arrest him, (2) the warrantless search of his vehicle was not consensual, (3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19378 - 2005-08-23
COURT OF APPEALS
the search of his friend’s apartment and basement, the police did not have exigent circumstances to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133593 - 2015-01-26
the search of his friend’s apartment and basement, the police did not have exigent circumstances to enter
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133593 - 2015-01-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
suppression motion. He asserts that: he had standing to challenge the search of his friend’s apartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133593 - 2017-09-21
suppression motion. He asserts that: he had standing to challenge the search of his friend’s apartment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=133593 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to a defective search warrant. Because we conclude that the affidavit contained sufficient facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=893031 - 2024-12-26
to a defective search warrant. Because we conclude that the affidavit contained sufficient facts to support
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=893031 - 2024-12-26
[PDF]
NOTICE
with Bell and two ensuing searches of his person, the second of which yielded the narcotics at issue. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33393 - 2014-09-15
with Bell and two ensuing searches of his person, the second of which yielded the narcotics at issue. ¶3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33393 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the phone number of the phone, that constituted a “search” of his phone under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1201281 - 2026-11-05
the phone number of the phone, that constituted a “search” of his phone under the Fourth Amendment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1201281 - 2026-11-05
[PDF]
State v. Jerome A. Engl
). Engl contends that the search of his pants pockets following a traffic stop violated his Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14603 - 2017-09-21
). Engl contends that the search of his pants pockets following a traffic stop violated his Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14603 - 2017-09-21
State v. Roscoe Patterson
a consent to search the apartment. Rohde testified that Patterson was not in custody when he signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12650 - 2005-03-31
a consent to search the apartment. Rohde testified that Patterson was not in custody when he signed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12650 - 2005-03-31