Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 83330 for simple case search.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 83330 for simple case search.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was an unreasonable search because his offense was a noncriminal violation, and exigent circumstances did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66409 - 2014-09-15
was an unreasonable search because his offense was a noncriminal violation, and exigent circumstances did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66409 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124830 - 2017-09-21
, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding, the State
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=124830 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was an unreasonable search because his offense was a noncriminal violation, and exigent circumstances did not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66409 - 2011-06-22
was an unreasonable search because his offense was a noncriminal violation, and exigent circumstances did not exist
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66409 - 2011-06-22
COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124830 - 2014-10-27
by the circuit court, which analyzed the case using the principles of probable cause to search. Notwithstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124830 - 2014-10-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. In Brown County Circuit Court case No. 2011CF705, the State charged Machicote with attempted armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104804 - 2017-09-21
. In Brown County Circuit Court case No. 2011CF705, the State charged Machicote with attempted armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104804 - 2017-09-21
State v. John E. Kehler
cross-examination of a state witness regarding consent to search his automobile. We affirm on these two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10592 - 2005-03-31
cross-examination of a state witness regarding consent to search his automobile. We affirm on these two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. John E. Kehler
Fischer testified that during the search of Kehler's automobile, he looked in a toilet case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10592 - 2017-09-20
Fischer testified that during the search of Kehler's automobile, he looked in a toilet case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10592 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a distinction that the case law appears to recognize between assignment documents, which can take the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691777 - 2023-08-17
for a distinction that the case law appears to recognize between assignment documents, which can take the form
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=691777 - 2023-08-17
[PDF]
WI 73
2021 WI 73 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP1028-J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390784 - 2021-09-01
2021 WI 73 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2020AP1028-J
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=390784 - 2021-09-01
State v. Martin J. Zielinski
that under the particular facts in this case, the search was reasonable; therefore, the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19
that under the particular facts in this case, the search was reasonable; therefore, the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19635 - 2005-09-19