Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Tris S. Treviranus v. Jay Treviranus
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Tris S. Treviranus appeals from the trial court’s “Order Enforcing Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-03-31
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Tris S. Treviranus appeals from the trial court’s “Order Enforcing Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. 1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4318 - 2017-09-19
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. 1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4318 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John A. Clements
not challenge his conviction, but instead challenges restitution ordered by the trial judge. Alleged Math
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2734 - 2017-09-19
not challenge his conviction, but instead challenges restitution ordered by the trial judge. Alleged Math
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2734 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assault of a child. Yang contends the trial No. 2013AP2761-CR 2 court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-07
assault of a child. Yang contends the trial No. 2013AP2761-CR 2 court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to impeach a principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to impeach a principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15520 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15524 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21