Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 58267 for speedy trial.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 58267 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
his motion for a new trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32678 - 2014-09-15
his motion for a new trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32678 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
assault of a child. Yang contends the trial No. 2013AP2761-CR 2 court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-07
assault of a child. Yang contends the trial No. 2013AP2761-CR 2 court erred in denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-07
[PDF]
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. 1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4318 - 2017-09-19
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. 1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4318 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. John A. Clements
not challenge his conviction, but instead challenges restitution ordered by the trial judge. Alleged Math
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2734 - 2017-09-19
not challenge his conviction, but instead challenges restitution ordered by the trial judge. Alleged Math
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2734 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2 At the plea hearing, the State also told the trial court that part of the agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111912 - 2017-09-21
. 2 At the plea hearing, the State also told the trial court that part of the agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111912 - 2017-09-21
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.1 Pitzka argues that he is entitled to a new trial on the bases of the court’s admission of other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973500 - 2025-06-25
.1 Pitzka argues that he is entitled to a new trial on the bases of the court’s admission of other
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=973500 - 2025-06-25
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
was deprived of his right to present a defense at trial, and (4) trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386545 - 2021-07-14
was deprived of his right to present a defense at trial, and (4) trial counsel provided ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=386545 - 2021-07-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, the trial court lacked competency to proceed; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350523 - 2021-03-31
, the trial court lacked competency to proceed; (2) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=350523 - 2021-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Burris’s conviction and remanded for a new trial. See State v. Burris, No. 2009AP956-CR, unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74124 - 2014-09-15
Burris’s conviction and remanded for a new trial. See State v. Burris, No. 2009AP956-CR, unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74124 - 2014-09-15