Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
his motion for a new trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32678 - 2014-09-15
his motion for a new trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32678 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2 At the plea hearing, the State also told the trial court that part of the agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111912 - 2017-09-21
. 2 At the plea hearing, the State also told the trial court that part of the agreement
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111912 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
NOTICE
(collectively, Wagner), on claim preclusion grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
(collectively, Wagner), on claim preclusion grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Wisconsin Gas Company v. Allos, Inc.
. Affirmed. No. 98-1945-FT 2 CURLEY, J.1 Allos, Inc. (Allos) appeals the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14233 - 2014-09-15
. Affirmed. No. 98-1945-FT 2 CURLEY, J.1 Allos, Inc. (Allos) appeals the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14233 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15522 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15522 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. 1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4318 - 2017-09-19
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. 1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4318 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to impeach a principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
trial. The issue is whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to impeach a principal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32678 - 2008-05-12
Tris S. Treviranus v. Jay Treviranus
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Tris S. Treviranus appeals from the trial court’s “Order Enforcing Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-05-09
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Tris S. Treviranus appeals from the trial court’s “Order Enforcing Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-05-09
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31
an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence.[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4318 - 2005-03-31