Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3551 - 3560 of 20874 for word.

[PDF] NOTICE
and substantial breach of 3 We use the word “forfeiture
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=54852 - 2014-09-15

American Standard Insurance Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
words, the commission interpreted the phrase “nondiscriminatory … tax” in the federal law to validate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12361 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] American Standard Insurance Company v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
. In other words, the commission interpreted the phrase “nondiscriminatory … tax” in the federal law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12361 - 2017-09-21

Dale Rebernick v. Wausau General Insurance Company
. If that language is clear, we apply it as it reads because the words used by the legislature are the best evidence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7324 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Heather C. Fischer v. Midwest Security Insurance Company
a reasonable person in the position of the insured would have understood the words of the policy to mean. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5616 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] WI App 21
to “maintain” the Prudential Policy. The court determined that the word “maintain” is not ambiguous
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=636848 - 2023-05-23

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, 688, 492 N.W.2d 361 (Ct. App. 1992). No. 2011AP2748 7 Moreover, the words “deemed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=77519 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
was saying those words in general. ¶15 The trial court found Futch guilty as charged. The court found
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=638192 - 2023-03-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, ordinary, and accepted meaning, except for technical or specially-defined words or phrases. Id., ¶45
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=161306 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, as we assume the legislature’s intent is expressed in the words it used.” Juneau Cnty. v. Associated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=118312 - 2014-09-15