Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35511 - 35520 of 91150 for 1.
Search results 35511 - 35520 of 91150 for 1.
State v. David A. Kelly
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7764 - 2005-03-31
of Appeals. See § 808.10 and Rule 809.62(1), Stats. This opinion is subject to further editing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7764 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Carl J. Knapp
Wis.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). A new factor is a fact highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9261 - 2017-09-19
Wis.2d 1, 8, 434 N.W.2d 609, 611 (1989). A new factor is a fact highly relevant to the imposition
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9261 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Andre Derrick Wingo appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131706 - 2014-12-15
. Before Curley, P.J., Kessler and Brennan, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Andre Derrick Wingo appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=131706 - 2014-12-15
[PDF]
Jerome C. Ruesch v. Su Cheng Ruesch
, JR., Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich, Vergeront and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jerome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16306 - 2017-09-21
, JR., Judge. Affirmed. Before Eich, Vergeront and Roggensack, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jerome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16306 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Acuity v. Anton Rems
. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Acuity appeals a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24884 - 2017-09-21
. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Acuity appeals a declaratory
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24884 - 2017-09-21
Tony Shaw v. Gary R. McCaughtry
in gang activity.[1] The warden affirmed the conspiracy and disruptive conduct charges, but the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12871 - 2005-03-31
in gang activity.[1] The warden affirmed the conspiracy and disruptive conduct charges, but the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12871 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Oneida County: Conrad A. richards, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 REILLY, J.[1] Raymond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90023 - 2012-12-04
of the circuit court for Oneida County: Conrad A. richards, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 REILLY, J.[1] Raymond
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90023 - 2012-12-04
State v. Elmer W. VanBoven
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Elmer W. VanBoven appeals pro se from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15241 - 2005-03-31
and Snyder, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Elmer W. VanBoven appeals pro se from an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15241 - 2005-03-31
Michael P. Murphy v. Daniel R. Bertrand
(Ct. App. 1990). The court’s review is limited to whether (1) the committee stayed within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13874 - 2005-03-31
(Ct. App. 1990). The court’s review is limited to whether (1) the committee stayed within its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13874 - 2005-03-31
Jonathan P. Cole v. Gerald A. Berge
remanded with directions. Before Vergeront, P.J., Roggensack and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4852 - 2005-03-31
remanded with directions. Before Vergeront, P.J., Roggensack and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4852 - 2005-03-31