Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35511 - 35520 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
Search results 35511 - 35520 of 82993 for case codes/1000.
Kimberly K. Larsen v. School District of Rhinelander
not dispute that she failed to meet the requirements of § 893.80, Stats., as it has been interpreted in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12997 - 2005-03-31
not dispute that she failed to meet the requirements of § 893.80, Stats., as it has been interpreted in case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12997 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
agree with the circuit court that this case is controlled by Griffin, 183 Wis. 2d 327. In Griffin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88638 - 2012-10-24
agree with the circuit court that this case is controlled by Griffin, 183 Wis. 2d 327. In Griffin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=88638 - 2012-10-24
Stephen E. Lee v. Labor & Industry Review Commission
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8807 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8807 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case, and the defendant elected not to respond. Under the circumstances, his current claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160862 - 2017-09-21
in this case, and the defendant elected not to respond. Under the circumstances, his current claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160862 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
recognize, however, that the amount of explanation needed for a sentencing decision varies from case to case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74191 - 2012-01-22
recognize, however, that the amount of explanation needed for a sentencing decision varies from case to case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=74191 - 2012-01-22
COURT OF APPEALS
sample in an earlier felony case. ¶5 The court denied the motion. It found Rivera’s materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30659 - 2007-10-22
sample in an earlier felony case. ¶5 The court denied the motion. It found Rivera’s materials
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30659 - 2007-10-22
[PDF]
State v. Timothy J. Bartos
At the close of the State’s case, Bartos moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15374 - 2017-09-21
At the close of the State’s case, Bartos moved for a directed verdict on the grounds that the State had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15374 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 31, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26957 - 2006-10-30
and explainable basis” with “delineation of the primary sentencing factors to the particular facts of the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26957 - 2006-10-30
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2011AP1572 Cir. Ct. No. 2010CV4434
legislation violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84445 - 2014-09-15
legislation violates the Wisconsin Constitution’s marriage amendment. Specifically, this case presents
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84445 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case is whether Zorman is entitled to summary judgment on his claim for a prescriptive easement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67958 - 2011-07-13
in this case is whether Zorman is entitled to summary judgment on his claim for a prescriptive easement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=67958 - 2011-07-13