Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35541 - 35550 of 63284 for Motion for joint custody.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
bail jumping counts, as well as an order denying his postconviction motion. Krause raises two
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=993175 - 2025-08-05

[PDF] State v. James D. Miller
. STAT. § 939.74(4). 3 ¶6 Miller responded with a motion to dismiss, alleging that the sexual
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4001 - 2017-09-20

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16750 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16768 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16748 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] NOTICE
a motion for summary judgment on February 1, 2006, asking the court to dismiss the counterclaims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34412 - 2014-09-15

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16730 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 108
Transport’s motion to reopen discovery and reconsider the expected-or- intended decision. ¶2 NCR cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=87326 - 2014-09-15

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16760 - 2005-03-31

Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
to November 15, 2001. ¶5 Mikrut moved for reconsideration; the motion was denied. He appealed, asserting
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16744 - 2005-03-31