Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35541 - 35550 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 35541 - 35550 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. John C. Cleveland
§ 20.06(9). Cleveland pled not guilty, and a jury found him guilty of both violations. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4223 - 2017-09-19
§ 20.06(9). Cleveland pled not guilty, and a jury found him guilty of both violations. The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4223 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to any issue that could be raised on appeal. After a jury trial, Bob was convicted of one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481501 - 2022-02-09
to any issue that could be raised on appeal. After a jury trial, Bob was convicted of one count
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=481501 - 2022-02-09
94-CV-225 Abraham Jahnke v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
limits are invalid for deviating from his rational expectations. They also argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11620 - 2005-03-31
limits are invalid for deviating from his rational expectations. They also argue that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11620 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Charles Terry and Angel Terry v. Rock County Board of Adjustment
their petition for certiorari review.1 The trial court concluded that the petition was not timely filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15290 - 2017-09-21
their petition for certiorari review.1 The trial court concluded that the petition was not timely filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15290 - 2017-09-21
Charles Terry and Angel Terry v. Rock County Board of Adjustment
) appeal from an order dismissing their petition for certiorari review.[1] The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15290 - 2005-03-31
) appeal from an order dismissing their petition for certiorari review.[1] The trial court concluded
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15290 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jackie Green
not provided us with adequate documentation to support his argument, we affirm the trial court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16207 - 2005-03-31
not provided us with adequate documentation to support his argument, we affirm the trial court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16207 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jackie Green
not provided us with adequate documentation to support his argument, we affirm the trial court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16209 - 2005-03-31
not provided us with adequate documentation to support his argument, we affirm the trial court’s order denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16209 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
motion in 2010. The court denied the motion in 2012. Smiley first argues on appeal that his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107407 - 2014-01-23
motion in 2010. The court denied the motion in 2012. Smiley first argues on appeal that his trial
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107407 - 2014-01-23
State v. Jason R. Kuehn
that the trial court failed to consider pertinent factors and circumstances when imposing sentence. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9389 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court failed to consider pertinent factors and circumstances when imposing sentence. The trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9389 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason R. Kuehn
described as a single act. Kuehn next argues that the trial court failed to consider pertinent factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9389 - 2017-09-19
described as a single act. Kuehn next argues that the trial court failed to consider pertinent factors
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9389 - 2017-09-19