Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35551 - 35560 of 66464 for motion to dismiss.
Search results 35551 - 35560 of 66464 for motion to dismiss.
State v. Steven Blank
appeals an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm the order. Blank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11734 - 2005-03-31
appeals an order denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm the order. Blank
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11734 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark Anthony Kelley
his postconviction motion. He claims that: (1) he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12542 - 2017-09-21
his postconviction motion. He claims that: (1) he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12542 - 2017-09-21
Dane County v. James P. Sullivan
his motion for summary judgment in the refusal proceedings; and (2) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
his motion for summary judgment in the refusal proceedings; and (2) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12913 - 2005-03-31
State v. James P. Sullivan
his motion for summary judgment in the refusal proceedings; and (2) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
his motion for summary judgment in the refusal proceedings; and (2) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12789 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
alcohol level as a third offense. 2 Fischer also appeals the order denying her postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219176 - 2018-09-18
alcohol level as a third offense. 2 Fischer also appeals the order denying her postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219176 - 2018-09-18
State v. Mark Anthony Kelley
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims that: (1) he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12542 - 2005-03-31
also appeals from an order denying his postconviction motion. He claims that: (1) he received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12542 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Dane County v. James P. Sullivan
his motion for summary judgment in the refusal proceedings; and (2) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12913 - 2017-09-21
his motion for summary judgment in the refusal proceedings; and (2) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12913 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
court1 denying his motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. ¶2 In 2016
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095583 - 2026-03-25
court1 denying his motion for postconviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. ¶2 In 2016
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1095583 - 2026-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
the denial of a postconviction motion filed under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06),[1] and an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34770 - 2008-12-03
the denial of a postconviction motion filed under Wis. Stat. § 974.06 (2005-06),[1] and an order denying his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34770 - 2008-12-03
[PDF]
State v. James P. Sullivan
his motion for summary judgment in the refusal proceedings; and (2) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12789 - 2017-09-21
his motion for summary judgment in the refusal proceedings; and (2) the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12789 - 2017-09-21