Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35571 - 35580 of 83201 for case code.
Search results 35571 - 35580 of 83201 for case code.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that a decision in this appeal will have any practical effect in this case, this court dismisses her appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053715 - 2025-12-23
that a decision in this appeal will have any practical effect in this case, this court dismisses her appeal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053715 - 2025-12-23
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=137161 - 2015-03-08
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). Our review in this case is informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27102 - 2006-11-14
v. Bentley, 201 Wis. 2d 303, 311, 548 N.W.2d 50 (1996). Our review in this case is informed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27102 - 2006-11-14
COURT OF APPEALS
case to trial. Walker subsequently asked the court to allow his trial counsel to withdraw as he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120183 - 2014-08-25
case to trial. Walker subsequently asked the court to allow his trial counsel to withdraw as he did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120183 - 2014-08-25
COURT OF APPEALS
barred, and further requests limitations on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12
barred, and further requests limitations on Obriecht’s future ability to file cases as a sanction
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31175 - 2007-12-12
[PDF]
State v. Brian J. Dorsey
and how it would have altered the outcome of the case. See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18503 - 2017-09-21
and how it would have altered the outcome of the case. See State v. Leighton, 2000 WI App 156, ¶38
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18503 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
account of the conversation. ¶12 While our supreme court rejected estoppel arguments in both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56222 - 2010-11-01
account of the conversation. ¶12 While our supreme court rejected estoppel arguments in both cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=56222 - 2010-11-01
COURT OF APPEALS
in this case were summarized in our decision affirming Olson’s convictions in his direct appeal: On November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50106 - 2010-05-17
in this case were summarized in our decision affirming Olson’s convictions in his direct appeal: On November 28
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=50106 - 2010-05-17
Randall Seltrecht v. Christine A. Bremer
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8866 - 2005-03-31
PUBLISHED OPINION Case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8866 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert Vargas
in the past he admitted it and took his punishment but that he did not make such an admission in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8463 - 2005-03-31
in the past he admitted it and took his punishment but that he did not make such an admission in this case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8463 - 2005-03-31