Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35571 - 35580 of 65925 for e j.
Search results 35571 - 35580 of 65925 for e j.
State v. Gregory Jordan
from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10995 - 2005-03-31
from judgments and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10995 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
is deferential. See id., ¶33. “[W]e will not disturb the exercise of the circuit court’s sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235089 - 2019-02-13
is deferential. See id., ¶33. “[W]e will not disturb the exercise of the circuit court’s sentencing
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=235089 - 2019-02-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 971.23(1)(e) (2017-18),4 the prosecutor was required to provide the defense with a written summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252215 - 2020-01-14
. § 971.23(1)(e) (2017-18),4 the prosecutor was required to provide the defense with a written summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=252215 - 2020-01-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
noted that Jepsen stated during his interview that “[h]e cannot see himself committing this type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260757 - 2020-05-19
noted that Jepsen stated during his interview that “[h]e cannot see himself committing this type
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=260757 - 2020-05-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43711 - 2014-09-15
of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed. Before Neubauer, P.J
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43711 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
testified about Harrell’s continuing problems with female guards and a patient, demonstrating “[h]e simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39560 - 2009-08-17
testified about Harrell’s continuing problems with female guards and a patient, demonstrating “[h]e simply
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39560 - 2009-08-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
2 The Honorable Karen E. Christenson denied the pretrial motion. The Honorable Charles F. Kahn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247944 - 2019-10-01
2 The Honorable Karen E. Christenson denied the pretrial motion. The Honorable Charles F. Kahn
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=247944 - 2019-10-01
[PDF]
State v. Arthur B. Patton
presented at the suppression hearing. On January 1, 2001, Officer Pablo E. Torres of the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
presented at the suppression hearing. On January 1, 2001, Officer Pablo E. Torres of the City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5467 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stop, “[w]e must determine whether the officer discovered information subsequent to the initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196751 - 2017-10-02
stop, “[w]e must determine whether the officer discovered information subsequent to the initial stop
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196751 - 2017-10-02
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e). (2013-14). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152382 - 2017-09-21
1 This appeal is decided by one judge pursuant to WIS. STAT. § 752.31(2)(e). (2013-14). All
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=152382 - 2017-09-21