Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35571 - 35580 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 35571 - 35580 of 58458 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
NOTICE
at sentencing, and he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48820 - 2014-09-15
at sentencing, and he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel because trial counsel did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48820 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Joel R. Zarnke
, contrary to § 948.05(1)(c), STATS. The trial court concluded that § 948.05 was unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12596 - 2017-09-21
, contrary to § 948.05(1)(c), STATS. The trial court concluded that § 948.05 was unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12596 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and his trial attorney testified. After considering the witnesses’ testimony, the court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572612 - 2022-10-04
and his trial attorney testified. After considering the witnesses’ testimony, the court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572612 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
State v. James H. Hornung
2 denying his postconviction suppression motion. Hornung argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15085 - 2017-09-21
2 denying his postconviction suppression motion. Hornung argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15085 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William N. Ledford
it. Before Rodriguez’s trial, however, Ledford sent a notarized statement to Rodriguez’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2402 - 2017-09-19
it. Before Rodriguez’s trial, however, Ledford sent a notarized statement to Rodriguez’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2402 - 2017-09-19
State v. James H. Hornung
further appeals an order denying his postconviction suppression motion. Hornung argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15085 - 2005-03-31
further appeals an order denying his postconviction suppression motion. Hornung argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15085 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
”—and that both of her trial counsel performed ineffectively in representing her.2 She points to the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393491 - 2021-07-21
”—and that both of her trial counsel performed ineffectively in representing her.2 She points to the fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=393491 - 2021-07-21
[PDF]
Patrick J. Brick v. Janet O'Brien-Brick
, Janet O'Brien-Brick, and her former employer, Sacred Heart Hospital, and its insurer.1 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9824 - 2017-09-19
, Janet O'Brien-Brick, and her former employer, Sacred Heart Hospital, and its insurer.1 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9824 - 2017-09-19
State v. James D. Paulson
reconsideration motion.[2] He argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
reconsideration motion.[2] He argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the loan. 4 The matter was set for a bench trial, at which Blake appeared without representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228697 - 2018-11-27
the loan. 4 The matter was set for a bench trial, at which Blake appeared without representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228697 - 2018-11-27

