Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35581 - 35590 of 39998 for financial disclosure statement.
Search results 35581 - 35590 of 39998 for financial disclosure statement.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
) there is a feasible motive for the initial false statement; and, (2) there are circumstantial guarantees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616405 - 2023-01-31
) there is a feasible motive for the initial false statement; and, (2) there are circumstantial guarantees
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=616405 - 2023-01-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
’ and their mother’s prior statements, encouraging the jury to weigh the lack of specificity against them. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139074 - 2017-09-21
’ and their mother’s prior statements, encouraging the jury to weigh the lack of specificity against them. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=139074 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
police officer who testified that the statements of the State’s star witness E.G. were ‘very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219528 - 2018-09-25
police officer who testified that the statements of the State’s star witness E.G. were ‘very
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219528 - 2018-09-25
[PDF]
Charlene M. Potkay v. City of Marinette
not develop this statement as an issue on appeal and therefore we do not address it. See State v. Gulrud
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8741 - 2017-09-19
not develop this statement as an issue on appeal and therefore we do not address it. See State v. Gulrud
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8741 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jennifer K. Matejka
the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 436-37 (1984). Statements given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14973 - 2005-03-31
the meaning of the Fourth Amendment. See Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 436-37 (1984). Statements given
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14973 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
made statements to the Committee. [4] Eslinger and the Spicklers’ attorney made presentations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66288 - 2011-06-20
made statements to the Committee. [4] Eslinger and the Spicklers’ attorney made presentations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=66288 - 2011-06-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Muehlbauer testified that she did not mention Matt to the police or in her written statement because she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140852 - 2017-09-21
. Muehlbauer testified that she did not mention Matt to the police or in her written statement because she
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140852 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jon M. Schirmang
be counted against him; that the statement given misled him; and that he was prevented from making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11108 - 2017-09-19
be counted against him; that the statement given misled him; and that he was prevented from making
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11108 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
with minor children, the court’s statements do not constitute incorrect information or [indicate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197745 - 2017-10-10
with minor children, the court’s statements do not constitute incorrect information or [indicate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=197745 - 2017-10-10
[PDF]
State v. Airry Massey
that Sheppard was not a credible witness is not a new factor. First, Sheppard’s inconsistent statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3796 - 2017-09-20
that Sheppard was not a credible witness is not a new factor. First, Sheppard’s inconsistent statements were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3796 - 2017-09-20