Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35581 - 35590 of 58480 for speedy trial.
Search results 35581 - 35590 of 58480 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Supreme Court rule petition 18-03 supporting memo
. The trial court struck the late answer, denied the motion to enlarge time, and entered an order
/supreme/docs/1803memo.pdf - 2018-04-05
. The trial court struck the late answer, denied the motion to enlarge time, and entered an order
/supreme/docs/1803memo.pdf - 2018-04-05
[PDF]
Oral Argument Synopses - November 2010
, the defendant asks the Supreme Court to review whether a new trial must be held in the interest of justice
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56270 - 2014-09-15
, the defendant asks the Supreme Court to review whether a new trial must be held in the interest of justice
/sc/orasyn/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56270 - 2014-09-15
State v. William N. Ledford
and that Small appeared intimidated and said he would sign it. Before Rodriguez’s trial, however, Ledford sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2402 - 2005-03-31
and that Small appeared intimidated and said he would sign it. Before Rodriguez’s trial, however, Ledford sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2402 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Joel R. Zarnke
, contrary to § 948.05(1)(c), STATS. The trial court concluded that § 948.05 was unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12596 - 2017-09-21
, contrary to § 948.05(1)(c), STATS. The trial court concluded that § 948.05 was unconstitutional
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12596 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and his trial attorney testified. After considering the witnesses’ testimony, the court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572612 - 2022-10-04
and his trial attorney testified. After considering the witnesses’ testimony, the court denied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=572612 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
State v. James H. Hornung
2 denying his postconviction suppression motion. Hornung argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15085 - 2017-09-21
2 denying his postconviction suppression motion. Hornung argues that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15085 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. William N. Ledford
it. Before Rodriguez’s trial, however, Ledford sent a notarized statement to Rodriguez’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2402 - 2017-09-19
it. Before Rodriguez’s trial, however, Ledford sent a notarized statement to Rodriguez’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2402 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Patrick J. Brick v. Janet O'Brien-Brick
, Janet O'Brien-Brick, and her former employer, Sacred Heart Hospital, and its insurer.1 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9824 - 2017-09-19
, Janet O'Brien-Brick, and her former employer, Sacred Heart Hospital, and its insurer.1 The trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9824 - 2017-09-19
Gary Hannemann v. Craig Boyson
agree with Boyson on this issue and reverse that part of the judgment and remand for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6568 - 2005-03-31
agree with Boyson on this issue and reverse that part of the judgment and remand for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6568 - 2005-03-31
Marc J. Ackerman v. Malcolm K. Hatfield
without the benefit of a trial. We agree and reverse the summary judgment. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7459 - 2005-03-31
without the benefit of a trial. We agree and reverse the summary judgment. FACTS ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7459 - 2005-03-31