Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35591 - 35600 of 83216 for case code.
Search results 35591 - 35600 of 83216 for case code.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
-CR 2 upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248565 - 2019-10-09
-CR 2 upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=248565 - 2019-10-09
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659760 - 2023-05-25
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=659760 - 2023-05-25
[PDF]
Board of Attorneys Professional Responsibility v. Theodore F. Mazza
2002 WI 36 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 76-0476-D & 83-0843-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16843 - 2017-09-21
2002 WI 36 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 76-0476-D & 83-0843-D
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16843 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
. In this case, Pieters testified, an ethanol test was conducted by analyst Dan McManaway. McManaway’s test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145573 - 2015-08-04
. In this case, Pieters testified, an ethanol test was conducted by analyst Dan McManaway. McManaway’s test
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=145573 - 2015-08-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and summarily affirm. Nos. 2012AP2221-CRNM, 2012AP2222-CRNM 2 A criminal complaint in case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100154 - 2017-09-21
and summarily affirm. Nos. 2012AP2221-CRNM, 2012AP2222-CRNM 2 A criminal complaint in case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=100154 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Ibid. In this case, the facts are largely undisputed. Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72614 - 2011-10-24
was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment. Ibid. In this case, the facts are largely undisputed. Our task
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72614 - 2011-10-24
COURT OF APPEALS
’ favor was entitled to full faith and credit. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70365 - 2011-08-30
’ favor was entitled to full faith and credit. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 This case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=70365 - 2011-08-30
State v. Henry A. Phillips
the circumstances in this case, Phillips' admission was sufficient. Therefore, this court affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
the circumstances in this case, Phillips' admission was sufficient. Therefore, this court affirms the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13887 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
, § 21(2) of the Wisconsin Constitution, Wisconsin SCR 11.02(1), and case law. A circuit court may adopt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89101 - 2012-11-13
, § 21(2) of the Wisconsin Constitution, Wisconsin SCR 11.02(1), and case law. A circuit court may adopt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=89101 - 2012-11-13
[PDF]
State v. Daniel Anderson
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0087-CR 96-0088
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10226 - 2017-09-20
COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case Nos.: 96-0087-CR 96-0088
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10226 - 2017-09-20