Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3561 - 3570 of 83359 for simple case search.

[PDF] State v. Ahmad Abdullah
) and 161.41(1m)(h)(1), STATS. Abdullah challenges the warrantless search of his home. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11544 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a search warrant to search Petrie’s home and outbuildings for twenty-seven items—power tools, firearms
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116711 - 2017-09-21

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5543 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5545 - 2017-09-19

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5544 - 2014-08-18

State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5545 - 2014-08-18

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5544 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Olayinka Kazeem Lagundoye
at 282, 564 N.W.2d at 760. Rather, Douangmala is a simple statutory construction case, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5543 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
cases of intoxicated driving. See State v. Wille, 185 Wis. 2d 673, 683, 518 N.W.2d 325 (Ct. App. 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36315 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] State v. Carl F. Hickman
fair and just reason for his change of heart, beyond the simple desire to have a trial. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2101 - 2017-09-19