Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3561 - 3570 of 58483 for speedy trial.
Search results 3561 - 3570 of 58483 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15521 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
a new trial with a twelve-person jury panel; (2) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15525 - 2017-09-21
Tris S. Treviranus v. Jay Treviranus
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Tris S. Treviranus appeals from the trial court’s “Order Enforcing Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-03-31
and Schudson, JJ. PER CURIAM. Tris S. Treviranus appeals from the trial court’s “Order Enforcing Judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
(collectively, Wagner), on claim preclusion grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
(collectively, Wagner), on claim preclusion grounds. Omegbu contends that the trial court erred when it: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=27042 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Wisconsin Gas Company v. Allos, Inc.
. Affirmed. No. 98-1945-FT 2 CURLEY, J.1 Allos, Inc. (Allos) appeals the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14233 - 2014-09-15
. Affirmed. No. 98-1945-FT 2 CURLEY, J.1 Allos, Inc. (Allos) appeals the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14233 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Herman Whiterabbit
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. 1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4318 - 2017-09-19
denying his postconviction motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. 1 We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4318 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
. Yang contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial based on juror bias. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-06
. Yang contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for a mistrial based on juror bias. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=123060 - 2014-10-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
borrowers and guarantor Charles Neiss. The borrowers argue that the trial court erred by: (1) allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86090 - 2014-09-15
borrowers and guarantor Charles Neiss. The borrowers argue that the trial court erred by: (1) allowing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=86090 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Burris’s conviction and remanded for a new trial. See State v. Burris, No. 2009AP956-CR, unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74124 - 2014-09-15
Burris’s conviction and remanded for a new trial. See State v. Burris, No. 2009AP956-CR, unpublished
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=74124 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
that the trial court erred by: (1) allowing Bank of America, N.A., to substitute for LaSalle Bank, N.A
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86090 - 2012-08-14
that the trial court erred by: (1) allowing Bank of America, N.A., to substitute for LaSalle Bank, N.A
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86090 - 2012-08-14