Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3561 - 3570 of 5602 for writ.
Search results 3561 - 3570 of 5602 for writ.
Robert Ruffer v. Town of Monroe - Board of Review
and declined to grant relief, Ruffer petitioned for a writ of certiorari to review the Board’s October 24, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12505 - 2005-03-31
and declined to grant relief, Ruffer petitioned for a writ of certiorari to review the Board’s October 24, 1994
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12505 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
days in Case No. 2013CF709. Ware subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
days in Case No. 2013CF709. Ware subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
days in Case No. 2013CF709. Ware subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
days in Case No. 2013CF709. Ware subsequently filed a petition for a writ of certiorari
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1053789 - 2025-12-23
2009 WI App 35
court signed a judgment of eviction and a writ of restitution. However, after receiving an “undertaking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35499 - 2009-03-24
court signed a judgment of eviction and a writ of restitution. However, after receiving an “undertaking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35499 - 2009-03-24
[PDF]
WI App 35
here. Two weeks later, the trial court signed a judgment of eviction and a writ of restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35499 - 2014-09-15
here. Two weeks later, the trial court signed a judgment of eviction and a writ of restitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=35499 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for a writ of habeas corpus). 3 Appointed counsel first filed a no-merit notice of appeal. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84444 - 2014-09-15
for a writ of habeas corpus). 3 Appointed counsel first filed a no-merit notice of appeal. The first
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=84444 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
must petition the appellate court that heard the appeal for a writ of habeas corpus). [3] Appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84444 - 2012-07-10
must petition the appellate court that heard the appeal for a writ of habeas corpus). [3] Appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=84444 - 2012-07-10
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
), a federal case, does not save him. First, Clay was an appeal of a writ of habeas corpus, not a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
), a federal case, does not save him. First, Clay was an appeal of a writ of habeas corpus, not a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=80607 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Marcia A. Klein v. Wisconsin Resource Center
In such a case, the requester may seek review of that decision through a writ of mandamus. See § 19.35(4)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12177 - 2017-09-21
In such a case, the requester may seek review of that decision through a writ of mandamus. See § 19.35(4)(b
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12177 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
(N.D. Ind. 1996), a federal case, does not save him. First, Clay was an appeal of a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09
(N.D. Ind. 1996), a federal case, does not save him. First, Clay was an appeal of a writ of habeas
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=80607 - 2012-04-09