Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35601 - 35610 of 58480 for speedy trial.
Search results 35601 - 35610 of 58480 for speedy trial.
[PDF]
Milwaukee Police Association v. City of Milwaukee
Police Association, appeal from a No. 01-1057 2 determination by the trial court not to compel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3863 - 2017-09-20
Police Association, appeal from a No. 01-1057 2 determination by the trial court not to compel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3863 - 2017-09-20
State v. James D. Paulson
reconsideration motion.[2] He argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
reconsideration motion.[2] He argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
for re-service or to issue a body attachment for the witness. Wilson also asserts that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170947 - 2017-09-21
for re-service or to issue a body attachment for the witness. Wilson also asserts that trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170947 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the loan. 4 The matter was set for a bench trial, at which Blake appeared without representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228697 - 2018-11-27
the loan. 4 The matter was set for a bench trial, at which Blake appeared without representation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=228697 - 2018-11-27
[PDF]
State v. James D. Paulson
, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that the snowmobile made excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3117 - 2017-09-20
, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that the snowmobile made excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3117 - 2017-09-20
State v. Walter P. VanDeMortel
. VanDeMortel argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the blood test results because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13969 - 2005-03-31
. VanDeMortel argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the blood test results because: (1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13969 - 2005-03-31
Patrick J. Brick v. Janet O'Brien-Brick
Hospital, and its insurer.[1] The trial court ruled that the statute of limitations had expired. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9824 - 2005-03-31
Hospital, and its insurer.[1] The trial court ruled that the statute of limitations had expired. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9824 - 2005-03-31
State v. James H. Hornung
further appeals an order denying his postconviction suppression motion. Hornung argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15085 - 2005-03-31
further appeals an order denying his postconviction suppression motion. Hornung argues that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15085 - 2005-03-31
Denise Scheberle v. Bertram Milson, M.D.
instruction at trial. There are adequate summary judgment proofs that would support that theory. A summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5633 - 2005-03-31
instruction at trial. There are adequate summary judgment proofs that would support that theory. A summary
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5633 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Vermaat contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel. He also asserts the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33845 - 2014-09-15
. Vermaat contends he received ineffective assistance of counsel. He also asserts the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=33845 - 2014-09-15