Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35611 - 35620 of 83216 for case code.
Search results 35611 - 35620 of 83216 for case code.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641612 - 2023-04-06
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We summarily affirm. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2021
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=641612 - 2023-04-06
[PDF]
Highland Manor Associates v. Michele Bast
2003 WI App 130 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2799
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5798 - 2017-09-19
2003 WI App 130 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 02-2799
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5798 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
the circuit court’s orders on procedural grounds. BACKGROUND ¶2 The background facts in this case were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50106 - 2014-09-15
the circuit court’s orders on procedural grounds. BACKGROUND ¶2 The background facts in this case were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50106 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
NOTICE
need not reach this issue. See State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, 492, 570 N.W.2d 44 (1997) (cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56222 - 2014-09-15
need not reach this issue. See State v. Castillo, 213 Wis. 2d 488, 492, 570 N.W.2d 44 (1997) (cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Brandy Albert Essex
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
in this case violates § 973.15(2)(a) because it could run consecutive to future sentences. We disagree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7393 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Ernest J.P., Jr.
the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case for recommitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
the statute, which does not purport to dictate how the county must prove its case for recommitment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7128 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
remedy appropriate to the needs of the particular case, the court’s discretion is nearly unlimited. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=98455 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas E. Formaro
of extended supervision. ¶9 The outcome of this case on appeal is controlled by Loranger, in which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4164 - 2017-09-20
of extended supervision. ¶9 The outcome of this case on appeal is controlled by Loranger, in which we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4164 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
WI APP 81
2010 WI APP 81 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1990-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50273 - 2014-09-15
2010 WI APP 81 COURT OF APPEALS OF WISCONSIN PUBLISHED OPINION Case No.: 2009AP1990-CR
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=50273 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was arrested and charged in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2012CF2612 with misdemeanor battery
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111898 - 2017-09-21
was arrested and charged in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case No. 2012CF2612 with misdemeanor battery
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=111898 - 2017-09-21