Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35611 - 35620 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 35611 - 35620 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Certification
, the trial court must determine the reasonable amount of restitution the defendant will be able to pay within
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33154 - 2008-06-24
, the trial court must determine the reasonable amount of restitution the defendant will be able to pay within
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33154 - 2008-06-24
CA Blank Order
trial counsel was ineffective for failing to pursue an intoxication defense. We briefly discuss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147375 - 2015-08-25
trial counsel was ineffective for failing to pursue an intoxication defense. We briefly discuss
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=147375 - 2015-08-25
State v. James D. Paulson
reconsideration motion.[2] He argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
reconsideration motion.[2] He argues that, as a matter of law, the evidence was insufficient to support the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3117 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 170
No. 2006AP1565-CR 2 awaiting trial. The circuit court denied Christensen’s motion, holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29265 - 2014-09-15
No. 2006AP1565-CR 2 awaiting trial. The circuit court denied Christensen’s motion, holding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29265 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. William N. Ledford
it. Before Rodriguez’s trial, however, Ledford sent a notarized statement to Rodriguez’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2402 - 2017-09-19
it. Before Rodriguez’s trial, however, Ledford sent a notarized statement to Rodriguez’s attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2402 - 2017-09-19
Patrick J. Brick v. Janet O'Brien-Brick
Hospital, and its insurer.[1] The trial court ruled that the statute of limitations had expired. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9824 - 2010-03-03
Hospital, and its insurer.[1] The trial court ruled that the statute of limitations had expired. Because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9824 - 2010-03-03
2007 WI APP 3
] The District contends that the trial court erred in compelling it to answer Sands’s discovery requests seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27540 - 2007-01-30
] The District contends that the trial court erred in compelling it to answer Sands’s discovery requests seeking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27540 - 2007-01-30
Gary Hannemann v. Craig Boyson
agree with Boyson on this issue and reverse that part of the judgment and remand for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6568 - 2005-03-31
agree with Boyson on this issue and reverse that part of the judgment and remand for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6568 - 2005-03-31
State v. William N. Ledford
and that Small appeared intimidated and said he would sign it. Before Rodriguez’s trial, however, Ledford sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2402 - 2005-03-31
and that Small appeared intimidated and said he would sign it. Before Rodriguez’s trial, however, Ledford sent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2402 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald Savinski v. Karren Kimble
., was inadequate and, therefore, the writ should not have been quashed by the trial court. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21
., was inadequate and, therefore, the writ should not have been quashed by the trial court. He also argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13278 - 2017-09-21