Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35631 - 35640 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 35631 - 35640 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
for a writ of habeas corpus in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2020CV7504. He claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070339 - 2026-02-03
for a writ of habeas corpus in Milwaukee County Circuit Court Case No. 2020CV7504. He claimed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1070339 - 2026-02-03
State v. One 1995 Jeep Grand Cherokee ID#1J4GZ58S6SC7744269
in this chapter…. The burden of proof of any exemption or exception is upon the person claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7015 - 2005-03-31
in this chapter…. The burden of proof of any exemption or exception is upon the person claiming
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7015 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
. ¶5 On appeal, Wheeler renews his claim that the circuit court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32449 - 2014-09-15
. ¶5 On appeal, Wheeler renews his claim that the circuit court misused its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32449 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Terry L. Cox
of an intoxicant (OMVWI), as a third offense. She claims that the trial court erred in sentencing her as a third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7479 - 2017-09-20
of an intoxicant (OMVWI), as a third offense. She claims that the trial court erred in sentencing her as a third
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7479 - 2017-09-20
City of Oshkosh v. Lucille A. Aiello
in front of her.] Aiello claims that this is the statement of the trial court which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8700 - 2005-03-31
in front of her.] Aiello claims that this is the statement of the trial court which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8700 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Chang N. Ju
complaining witnesses. He claims that the trial court's failure to sever was an erroneous exercise of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13262 - 2017-09-21
complaining witnesses. He claims that the trial court's failure to sever was an erroneous exercise of its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13262 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Badger Home Builders, Inc. v. Paul J. Kaminski
of the elements of a claim of duress is a wrongful or unlawful threat). We conclude it did not. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15770 - 2017-09-21
of the elements of a claim of duress is a wrongful or unlawful threat). We conclude it did not. ¶8
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15770 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
of later interests and have nothing to do with claims subsequently arising under state law.” See Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99724 - 2013-07-22
of later interests and have nothing to do with claims subsequently arising under state law.” See Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99724 - 2013-07-22
[PDF]
Milwaukee County v. Robert E. Berry
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He claims: (1) that the road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14922 - 2017-09-21
a motor vehicle while intoxicated, contrary to § 346.63(1)(a), STATS. He claims: (1) that the road
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14922 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit to a claim that the sentences were unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011148 - 2025-09-18
merit to a claim that the sentences were unduly harsh or excessive. See State v. Stenzel, 2004 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1011148 - 2025-09-18