Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35651 - 35660 of 83284 for case search.
Search results 35651 - 35660 of 83284 for case search.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190816 - 2017-09-21
conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2015-16). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190816 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
are here today for what I would anticipate to be the balance of testimony in this case, and we were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108350 - 2014-02-24
are here today for what I would anticipate to be the balance of testimony in this case, and we were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108350 - 2014-02-24
Pierre A. LaForte v. Timothy W. Bandoli
the case, arguing that the material facts were undisputed and seeking a determination that Bandoli’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2583 - 2005-03-31
the case, arguing that the material facts were undisputed and seeking a determination that Bandoli’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2583 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responsibility. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2), (6). An amended petition in A.A.L.’s case later added
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
responsibility. See WIS. STAT. § 48.415(2), (6). An amended petition in A.A.L.’s case later added
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1058668 - 2026-01-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
criminal sentences in connection with the revocation of his extended supervision in other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209467 - 2018-03-06
criminal sentences in connection with the revocation of his extended supervision in other cases
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209467 - 2018-03-06
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. Jordan
was based on the prosecutor’s contention that she could not put on a rebuttal case because, in order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6508 - 2017-09-19
was based on the prosecutor’s contention that she could not put on a rebuttal case because, in order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6508 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the case and “procedural history” appear to be Roger’s opinion stated as fact. It is axiomatic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97423 - 2014-09-15
of the case and “procedural history” appear to be Roger’s opinion stated as fact. It is axiomatic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97423 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Mark D. Pett
. The State appeals an order suppressing evidence in its case against Mark Pett. The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5726 - 2017-09-19
. The State appeals an order suppressing evidence in its case against Mark Pett. The trial court ruled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5726 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
possessing a firearm on July 18, 2013. 2 Our decision in this case is controlled by our supreme court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215640 - 2018-07-12
possessing a firearm on July 18, 2013. 2 Our decision in this case is controlled by our supreme court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=215640 - 2018-07-12
State v. D. Ramee K. Fulani
The case was tried before a jury and a different judge in early October, 2002. After the State rested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2011-09-22
The case was tried before a jury and a different judge in early October, 2002. After the State rested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6803 - 2011-09-22