Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35651 - 35660 of 55163 for n c.

COURT OF APPEALS
factors. As such, no “sufficient reason” is required. See State v. Grindemann, 2002 WI App 106, ¶19 n.4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29779 - 2007-07-23

[PDF] CA Blank Order
To: Hon. William S. Pocan Circuit Court Judge Milwaukee County Courthouse 901 N. 9th St., Room 401
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159896 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
State Public Defender 735 N. Water St., Ste 912 Milwaukee, WI 53202-4116 Criminal Appeals Unit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=177095 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
v. Krieger, 163 Wis. 2d 241, 249-51 & n.6, 471 N.W.2d 599 (Ct. App. 1991). There is no indication
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109558 - 2014-03-23

[PDF] State v. Richard T. Peffer
, cannot help him here. See State v. Windom, 169 Wis. 2d 341, 353 n.3, 485 N.W.2d 832 (Ct. App. 1992
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2188 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
of time Rutsch attempted to sell the property was relevant. See id., ¶20. The court noted, “[I]n my
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114327 - 2014-06-16

COURT OF APPEALS
n.10. ¶6 In its sentencing comments, the circuit court first considered the nature
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33530 - 2008-07-30

[PDF] CA Blank Order
333, 720 N.W.2d 134; see also Townsend v. Massey, 2011 WI App 160, ¶27 n.5, 338 Wis. 2d 114, 808 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=914056 - 2025-02-13

[PDF] State v. David R. Melstrand
. 2d 278, 294 n.11, 528 N.W.2d 502 (Ct. App. 1995). No. 01-2355-CR 01-2356 01-2357 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4345 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
or disprove that suspicion. ¶10 Richey contends that State v. Pickens, 2010 WI App 5, ¶11 n.1, 323 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=484561 - 2022-02-15