Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35661 - 35670 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35661 - 35670 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
CA Blank Order
in denying his motion to suppress because the officer did not possess the reasonable suspicion necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104734 - 2013-11-26
in denying his motion to suppress because the officer did not possess the reasonable suspicion necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104734 - 2013-11-26
State v. Jeffrey G. Meixelsperger
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because his arrest for OMVWI was not based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12906 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because his arrest for OMVWI was not based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12906 - 2005-03-31
Columbia County v. Gary O. Kloostra
) in violation of a Columbia County ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
) in violation of a Columbia County ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
Kingstad filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court concluded that David Kingstad in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20093 - 2014-09-15
Kingstad filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court concluded that David Kingstad in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20093 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Mequon v. Terry Quigley
in an erratic fashion. Quigley challenged the stop by a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15430 - 2017-09-21
in an erratic fashion. Quigley challenged the stop by a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15430 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Will James Robinson, Jr.
is now making is one that should have been raised by motion to dismiss or by a request to modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24660 - 2017-09-21
is now making is one that should have been raised by motion to dismiss or by a request to modify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24660 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of conviction entered in four cases, as well as an order denying his motion for plea withdrawal. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173636 - 2017-09-21
of conviction entered in four cases, as well as an order denying his motion for plea withdrawal. Based upon
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=173636 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Charles Newman
plea hearing granted. We affirm the trial court order denying Newman’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6304 - 2017-09-19
plea hearing granted. We affirm the trial court order denying Newman’s postconviction motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6304 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
denying his motion for reconsideration. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956025 - 2025-05-14
denying his motion for reconsideration. His appellate counsel filed a no-merit report pursuant to WIS
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=956025 - 2025-05-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
postconviction motion for sentencing relief. 1 Because we conclude that Williams failed to establish either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172920 - 2017-09-21
postconviction motion for sentencing relief. 1 Because we conclude that Williams failed to establish either
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172920 - 2017-09-21