Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35671 - 35680 of 91533 for 1.
Search results 35671 - 35680 of 91533 for 1.
Michelle Frank v. James Fritz
in entrusting their vehicle to him.[1] Fritz’s parents filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
in entrusting their vehicle to him.[1] Fritz’s parents filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12375 - 2005-03-31
Village of Shorewood Hills v. Kenneth R. McGrew
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: PATRICK J. FIEDLER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3450 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of the circuit court for Dane County: PATRICK J. FIEDLER, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3450 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
of Portage County (L.C. #2012SC481) Before Kloppenburg, J.[1] Joshua Baumgarten, pro se, appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108714 - 2014-03-03
of Portage County (L.C. #2012SC481) Before Kloppenburg, J.[1] Joshua Baumgarten, pro se, appeals
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108714 - 2014-03-03
State v. Corey O. Mackin
remanded for further proceedings. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7592 - 2005-03-31
remanded for further proceedings. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7592 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2023-24).1 Olivarez was advised of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921949 - 2025-03-04
(2023-24).1 Olivarez was advised of his right to file a response to the no-merit report, but he has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=921949 - 2025-03-04
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Thompson argues: (1) that there are new factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29
and an order denying his postconviction motion. Thompson argues: (1) that there are new factors
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=806811 - 2024-05-29
State v. Rubin E. Ards
A. Wagner, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
A. Wagner, Judge. Affirmed. Before Lundsten, P.J., Dykman and Deininger, JJ. ¶1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25870 - 2006-07-12
State v. Lothar W. Penkert
for reconsideration.[1] He raises the following issues: (1) that he has an “inalienable right” to travel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11972 - 2005-03-31
for reconsideration.[1] He raises the following issues: (1) that he has an “inalienable right” to travel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11972 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Case of the month - Feb 2016
Amendment of the Wisconsin Constitution, Wis. Const. Art. XI, § 3(1), trumps the Wisconsin Legislature’s
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/feb16.pdf - 2016-02-01
Amendment of the Wisconsin Constitution, Wis. Const. Art. XI, § 3(1), trumps the Wisconsin Legislature’s
/courts/resources/teacher/casemonth/docs/feb16.pdf - 2016-02-01
[PDF]
Wisconsin Supreme Court accepts one new case
, the Honorable Kelly J. McKnight, presiding, Respondent Issues presented: 1. Whether Wis. Stat. Ann
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac0323.pdf - 2023-03-09
, the Honorable Kelly J. McKnight, presiding, Respondent Issues presented: 1. Whether Wis. Stat. Ann
/courts/supreme/docs/oac/oac0323.pdf - 2023-03-09