Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35671 - 35680 of 69814 for hi.

[PDF] State v. Morgan Larson
against him charged the same offense in violation of his double- jeopardy protection. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11254 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
on the front porch. Penelton was wearing his hat tilted to the right, and he testified that he “had a feeling
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33522 - 2008-07-29

HMO of Wisconsin v. Shane T. Handley
. In August 1993, Handley, an eighteen-year-old, was injured in a two-vehicle accident. His mother's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10361 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brian L. Paarmann
the pedestrian, stopped his vehicle, activated his squad lights and got out of his car. As he was exiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8550 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
to repeated assaults of his adolescent daughter over a three-year period. According to the complaint
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30977 - 2007-11-26

State v. James A. Jackson
an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. He raises three issues for review—whether the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8682 - 2005-03-31

Todd M. Spoehr v. Regina R. Woroniecki
receive.” ¶3 At trial, Spoehr introduced expert medical testimony regarding the nature of his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6026 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brent R. Reed
that Reed’s eyes were bloodshot and his speech was slurred. Id. Reed immediately told Deputy Otto that he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26248 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 result of his blood test because the result was obtained without a warrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134436 - 2017-09-21

Kenosha County Department of Human Services v. Brian C.
the parental rights of Brian C. to his natural daughter, Nicole M.C. The sole issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4168 - 2005-03-31