Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35671 - 35680 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
Search results 35671 - 35680 of 60169 for quit claim deed/1000.
State v. Edward L. Wilson
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel without holding an evidentiary hearing. To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15642 - 2005-03-31
claim of ineffective assistance of counsel without holding an evidentiary hearing. To establish
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15642 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
, 2012).[3] There is no arguable merit to a claim that § 973.12(1) was not complied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92118 - 2013-01-29
, 2012).[3] There is no arguable merit to a claim that § 973.12(1) was not complied
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92118 - 2013-01-29
COURT OF APPEALS
cost to replace the home was going to be $231,435. ¶5 Babcock filed suit, raising claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36611 - 2009-05-27
cost to replace the home was going to be $231,435. ¶5 Babcock filed suit, raising claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36611 - 2009-05-27
CA Blank Order
Koleske’s postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. With respect to Koleske’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95380 - 2013-04-16
Koleske’s postconviction motion without an evidentiary hearing. With respect to Koleske’s claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95380 - 2013-04-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, ¶11, 247 Wis. 2d 750, 634 N.W.2d 604. Here, Kivi’s claim is predicated on WIS. STAT. § 939.48(1m)(ar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453178 - 2021-11-17
, ¶11, 247 Wis. 2d 750, 634 N.W.2d 604. Here, Kivi’s claim is predicated on WIS. STAT. § 939.48(1m)(ar
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=453178 - 2021-11-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, there would be no arguable merit to this claim. Finally, the no-merit report addresses whether there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214489 - 2018-06-15
, there would be no arguable merit to this claim. Finally, the no-merit report addresses whether there would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214489 - 2018-06-15
_WISCONSIN COURT OF APPEALS
may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28707 - 2007-07-11
may not be cited in any court of this state as precedent or authority except to support a claim of res
/ca/unptbl/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28707 - 2007-07-11
CA Blank Order
whether there is arguable merit to a claim that the sentences were an erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91451 - 2013-01-15
whether there is arguable merit to a claim that the sentences were an erroneous exercise of discretion
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91451 - 2013-01-15
Whitewater Court, Ltd. v. The City of Whitewater
) and $1,306,200 (Whitewater Woods). The taxpayers paid the resulting taxes under protest. Their claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7339 - 2005-03-31
) and $1,306,200 (Whitewater Woods). The taxpayers paid the resulting taxes under protest. Their claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7339 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. But the apartment manager claimed that three fire extinguishers, rather than two, were taken. So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32484 - 2008-04-22
. But the apartment manager claimed that three fire extinguishers, rather than two, were taken. So
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32484 - 2008-04-22