Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35691 - 35700 of 66553 for e j.
Search results 35691 - 35700 of 66553 for e j.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
conviction for robbery while using a dangerous weapon. See WIS. STAT. §§ 943.32(1), 939.50(2)(e), 939.63(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70794 - 2014-09-15
conviction for robbery while using a dangerous weapon. See WIS. STAT. §§ 943.32(1), 939.50(2)(e), 939.63(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70794 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72316 - 2014-09-15
a judgment and an order of the circuit court for Kenosha County: BRUCE E. SCHROEDER, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=72316 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Leopoldo Balderas, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
. In such an action, the trial court is to “determin[e] whether the order of the inspector of buildings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15581 - 2017-09-21
. In such an action, the trial court is to “determin[e] whether the order of the inspector of buildings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15581 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
the plea,” and “did not understand … the [e]ffect of the enhancement provisions and the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55527 - 2010-10-13
the plea,” and “did not understand … the [e]ffect of the enhancement provisions and the elements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55527 - 2010-10-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
the revocation of Colwell’s probation. No. 2008AP820-CR 5 ¶8 The judge reasoned that [w]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36732 - 2014-09-15
the revocation of Colwell’s probation. No. 2008AP820-CR 5 ¶8 The judge reasoned that [w]e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36732 - 2014-09-15
State v. April Dakins
. 1995). "[W]e have permitted exceptions when 'special needs, beyond the normal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10890 - 2005-03-31
. 1995). "[W]e have permitted exceptions when 'special needs, beyond the normal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10890 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
, demonstrating “[h]e simply is not changing or slowing down.” Fields also noted that such a reduction may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39560 - 2014-09-15
, demonstrating “[h]e simply is not changing or slowing down.” Fields also noted that such a reduction may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=39560 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
County: ROBERT E. EATON, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31926 - 2008-02-25
County: ROBERT E. EATON, Judge. Affirmed. Before Hoover, P.J., Peterson and Brunner, JJ
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=31926 - 2008-02-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and oral statements Andrew made as a CI in unrelated drug cases. First, WIS. STAT. § 971.23(1)(e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863165 - 2024-10-23
and oral statements Andrew made as a CI in unrelated drug cases. First, WIS. STAT. § 971.23(1)(e
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=863165 - 2024-10-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. App. 1992) (explaining that “[w]e may decline to review issues inadequately briefed.”)
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878677 - 2024-11-20
. App. 1992) (explaining that “[w]e may decline to review issues inadequately briefed.”)
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878677 - 2024-11-20