Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3571 - 3580 of 69076 for he.
Search results 3571 - 3580 of 69076 for he.
State v. Otis J. Martin
, and from the order denying him postconviction relief. He claims he was entitled to a hearing on his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31
, and from the order denying him postconviction relief. He claims he was entitled to a hearing on his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13734 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Abel Silva
the terms of the plea agreement, which justifies plea withdrawal; (3) that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7980 - 2017-09-19
the terms of the plea agreement, which justifies plea withdrawal; (3) that he received ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7980 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Martise D. Odems
-CR 2 from the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13974 - 2014-09-15
-CR 2 from the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13974 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott C. Harty
2 privileges” because he faced a consecutive sentence in Waukesha county is not a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15588 - 2017-09-21
2 privileges” because he faced a consecutive sentence in Waukesha county is not a “new factor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15588 - 2017-09-21
Chris Spangberg v. John C. Talis
no damage as a result of the alleged malpractice because he would not have prevailed in the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3184 - 2005-03-31
no damage as a result of the alleged malpractice because he would not have prevailed in the underlying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3184 - 2005-03-31
State v. Martise D. Odems
endangering safety, and from the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13974 - 2005-03-31
endangering safety, and from the order denying his motions for postconviction relief. He argues that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13974 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 111
the bar without him. He received a ride from three people he did not know. The driver stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37036 - 2011-02-07
the bar without him. He received a ride from three people he did not know. The driver stopped
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=37036 - 2011-02-07
[PDF]
NOTICE
without him. He received a ride from three people he did not know. The driver stopped at a nearby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36264 - 2014-09-15
without him. He received a ride from three people he did not know. The driver stopped at a nearby
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36264 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
with his cousins, who left the bar without him. He received a ride from three people he did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36264 - 2009-07-29
with his cousins, who left the bar without him. He received a ride from three people he did not know
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36264 - 2009-07-29
[PDF]
WI APP 111
and tequila shots. At bar time, Nakai argued with his cousins, who left the bar without him. He received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37036 - 2014-09-15
and tequila shots. At bar time, Nakai argued with his cousins, who left the bar without him. He received
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=37036 - 2014-09-15