Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3571 - 3580 of 7604 for ow.

[PDF] Farina Building Co., Inc. v. General Lumber & Supply Co., Inc.
for the windows, leaving a difference of $3268 owed to Farina. The court held that General was entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5298 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
a double recovery for the Borks, observing that its ruling did not change the amount owed by the Borks
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=258243 - 2020-04-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
$500.00 deductible. Sam’s Club argued that it did not owe a duty to prevent the hit-and-run accident
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1039537 - 2025-11-18

Tris S. Treviranus v. Jay Treviranus
to determine the disparity from the 50/50 division. It is expected that [Jay] will then owe her one half
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12398 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Kenneth A. Davis
, Craft told Davis that she was going to call her sister and ask her to bring the money Craft owed Davis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8648 - 2017-09-19

Tri-State Mechanical, Inc. v. Northland College
the $96,800 it was owed, and Tomlinson went out of business before all work was finished on the science
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6771 - 2005-03-31

Fred Myer v. City of Westby
the easement; nor do they establish that it has violated any duty it may owe to the plaintiff. The easement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2214 - 2005-03-31

Interior Custom Millwork, Inc. v. Ronald Filbrun
privileged is one of law and this court therefore owes no deference to the trial court's decision. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9326 - 2005-03-31

Brown County Department of Human Services v. James M.O.
a question of law and a reviewing court owes no deference to the trial court's determination. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13143 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
” in relitigating such a case that could potentially cause confusion for the jury: “[H]ow do you explain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255844 - 2020-03-10