Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3571 - 3580 of 59268 for quit claim deed.

CA Blank Order
characterized Valentine as a “highly intelligent person,” whose demonstrated intelligence undercut any claim
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100154 - 2013-07-29

State v. Britten A.B.
guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” Britten’s claim fails for two equally compelling reasons. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5297 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
of the totality of the circumstances, it was quite obvious to the officer that Bartelt was intoxicated, without
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=100745 - 2013-08-14

[PDF] WI App 130
to his battery sentence because that is, quite literally, the institution to which he was sentenced
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70096 - 2014-09-15

State v. Gary Rach
questions the constitutionality of the police stop. He claims that there was insufficient suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9860 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
home once or twice a week. Kristin cancelled appointments and there were “quite a few no- shows
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101554 - 2017-09-21

Frontsheet
memorandum, which was quite lengthy, described the results of its investigation concerning the petition
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34071 - 2009-11-24

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 19, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
suddenly and …. be quite dramatic, ... I mean I would almost guarantee that without medication he would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26853 - 2006-10-18

Cindy L. Klatt v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
intentions. Klatt submitted the memo and in it clearly stated that she had no intention of quitting her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5942 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Karl A. Burg by his legal guardian v. Cincinnati Casualty Insurance Co.
WIS. STAT. § 350.01(9r)] that supports [Burg’s] claim.” The court reasoned, “Here the facts show
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3336 - 2017-09-19