Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3571 - 3580 of 6139 for sheriff.
Search results 3571 - 3580 of 6139 for sheriff.
State v. Darryl E. Pierce
of six color photos provided by the Racine County Sheriff’s Department. Steinbrecher immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3800 - 2005-03-31
of six color photos provided by the Racine County Sheriff’s Department. Steinbrecher immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3800 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sheriff took about the incident. I stand by that report.” Dezotell also indicated that he considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72951 - 2011-10-31
sheriff took about the incident. I stand by that report.” Dezotell also indicated that he considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72951 - 2011-10-31
County of Jefferson v. Mark L. Guttenberg
. At approximately 3:00 a.m. on October 7, 1995, Jefferson County sheriff’s deputies and a state trooper were advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2005-03-31
. At approximately 3:00 a.m. on October 7, 1995, Jefferson County sheriff’s deputies and a state trooper were advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James F. Blask
, and released him only when a sheriff’s deputy appeared in response to a call for assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17252 - 2017-09-21
, and released him only when a sheriff’s deputy appeared in response to a call for assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17252 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Kurt J. Doerr
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
made at trial. Finally, Doerr claims that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13709 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
Arch Bay a total of $161,695.89, plus postjudgment attorney’s fees and costs, and ordering a sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86552 - 2012-08-29
Arch Bay a total of $161,695.89, plus postjudgment attorney’s fees and costs, and ordering a sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86552 - 2012-08-29
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
relevant testimony was presented. ¶3 The Winnebago County Sheriff’s Deputy who arrested Kaltenbach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611524 - 2023-01-18
relevant testimony was presented. ¶3 The Winnebago County Sheriff’s Deputy who arrested Kaltenbach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=611524 - 2023-01-18
State v. Sheila K. LaFortune
are undisputed. At approximately 12:15 a.m. on January 11, 2002, the Brown County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6999 - 2005-03-31
are undisputed. At approximately 12:15 a.m. on January 11, 2002, the Brown County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6999 - 2005-03-31
State v. Douglas E. Fitch
, “No, don’t do it.” Before Fitch could respond, the sheriff took him away because the proceedings were being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4719 - 2005-03-31
, “No, don’t do it.” Before Fitch could respond, the sheriff took him away because the proceedings were being
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4719 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
The sole witness at the suppression hearing was the sheriff’s department sergeant who stopped Troka’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16
The sole witness at the suppression hearing was the sheriff’s department sergeant who stopped Troka’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103152 - 2013-10-16