Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35711 - 35720 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35711 - 35720 of 63760 for Motion for joint custody.
COURT OF APPEALS
) (2005-06)[2] based on a guilty plea entered after denial of a motion to suppress the seizure of cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33777 - 2008-08-18
) (2005-06)[2] based on a guilty plea entered after denial of a motion to suppress the seizure of cocaine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=33777 - 2008-08-18
[PDF]
NOTICE
of a child.1 Hines also appeals from an order denying his motion for resentencing. Hines contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59990 - 2014-09-15
of a child.1 Hines also appeals from an order denying his motion for resentencing. Hines contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=59990 - 2014-09-15
CA Blank Order
in denying his motion to suppress because the officer did not possess the reasonable suspicion necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104734 - 2013-11-26
in denying his motion to suppress because the officer did not possess the reasonable suspicion necessary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=104734 - 2013-11-26
State v. Jeffrey G. Meixelsperger
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because his arrest for OMVWI was not based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12906 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence because his arrest for OMVWI was not based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12906 - 2005-03-31
Columbia County v. Gary O. Kloostra
) in violation of a Columbia County ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
) in violation of a Columbia County ordinance. He claims the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3970 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
2 court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a traffic stop. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36259 - 2014-09-15
2 court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained during a traffic stop. We affirm
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=36259 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
denying his postconviction motion, which asserted that he was sentenced on inaccurate information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873696 - 2024-11-13
denying his postconviction motion, which asserted that he was sentenced on inaccurate information
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=873696 - 2024-11-13
[PDF]
NOTICE
Kingstad filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court concluded that David Kingstad in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20093 - 2014-09-15
Kingstad filed a motion for summary judgment. The trial court concluded that David Kingstad in his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20093 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
City of Mequon v. Terry Quigley
in an erratic fashion. Quigley challenged the stop by a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15430 - 2017-09-21
in an erratic fashion. Quigley challenged the stop by a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15430 - 2017-09-21
State v. Will James Robinson, Jr.
is now making is one that should have been raised by motion to dismiss or by a request to modify the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24660 - 2006-03-29
is now making is one that should have been raised by motion to dismiss or by a request to modify the jury
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24660 - 2006-03-29