Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35731 - 35740 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35731 - 35740 of 63771 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. Robert James Rogers
Claire County jail and denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12608 - 2017-09-21
Claire County jail and denying his motion for postconviction relief. He argues that his trial counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12608 - 2017-09-21
State v. Raul R. Rodriguez
supervision, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26605 - 2006-09-27
supervision, and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. We affirm. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26605 - 2006-09-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying Reuter’s presentence motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29758 - 2014-09-15
is whether the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion by denying Reuter’s presentence motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29758 - 2014-09-15
State v. William E. Hampton
. The trial court denied Hampton's postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9599 - 2005-03-31
. The trial court denied Hampton's postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9599 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Kathleen Jensen v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
-Respondents. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Opinion Filed: June 19, 2001 Submitted on Briefs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17558 - 2017-09-21
-Respondents. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Opinion Filed: June 19, 2001 Submitted on Briefs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17558 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Garrett appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109723 - 2017-09-21
. Garrett appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=109723 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argued in Riverbank’s summary judgment motion. Nor did Rammer raise this issue at a hearing, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62850 - 2014-09-15
argued in Riverbank’s summary judgment motion. Nor did Rammer raise this issue at a hearing, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62850 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Introduction
, they must complete the Motion and Order to Revoke Suspension of Proceedings to Effect Reconciliation (FA
/formdisplay/FA-5006V_instructions.pdf?formNumber=FA-5006V&formType=Instructions&formatId=2&language=en - 2024-09-05
, they must complete the Motion and Order to Revoke Suspension of Proceedings to Effect Reconciliation (FA
/formdisplay/FA-5006V_instructions.pdf?formNumber=FA-5006V&formType=Instructions&formatId=2&language=en - 2024-09-05
[PDF]
Kim R. Smith v. Barbara J. Eastridge
motion for a new trial. In earlier proceedings, the trial court construed his late wife’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15429 - 2017-09-21
motion for a new trial. In earlier proceedings, the trial court construed his late wife’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15429 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
by denying his motions to amend his complaint. As to the first motion, Schiessle asserts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93989 - 2014-09-15
by denying his motions to amend his complaint. As to the first motion, Schiessle asserts
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93989 - 2014-09-15