Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35731 - 35740 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35731 - 35740 of 63732 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
merit to a motion to withdraw this plea. The no-merit report also addresses whether the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148193 - 2017-09-21
merit to a motion to withdraw this plea. The no-merit report also addresses whether the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148193 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Todd A. Lodholz v. Kay Higgins
for the Department defendants. ¶3 Lodholz first argues that the court erred by denying his motion for default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21630 - 2017-09-21
for the Department defendants. ¶3 Lodholz first argues that the court erred by denying his motion for default
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21630 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Scott J. Frey
to conduct the blood tests. The circuit court denied his motion to suppress, and Frey pled to the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4571 - 2017-09-19
to conduct the blood tests. The circuit court denied his motion to suppress, and Frey pled to the charges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4571 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
was the only ground argued in Riverbank’s summary judgment motion. Nor did Rammer raise this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62850 - 2011-04-13
was the only ground argued in Riverbank’s summary judgment motion. Nor did Rammer raise this issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62850 - 2011-04-13
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
motion in which he requested a resentencing hearing after the circuit court amended the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210639 - 2018-04-03
motion in which he requested a resentencing hearing after the circuit court amended the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=210639 - 2018-04-03
Jody Muschinske v. Jeffrey Muschinske
his motion for reconsideration.[1] The State argues that the trial court lost jurisdiction to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13490 - 2005-03-31
his motion for reconsideration.[1] The State argues that the trial court lost jurisdiction to review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13490 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jason Luepke
that the sentence is excessive and punishes him for prevailing in his motion for resentencing. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2470 - 2017-09-19
that the sentence is excessive and punishes him for prevailing in his motion for resentencing. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2470 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
for OWI. ¶3 Dillman filed a motion to suppress the evidence collected as a result of the traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94497 - 2013-03-26
for OWI. ¶3 Dillman filed a motion to suppress the evidence collected as a result of the traffic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94497 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for reconsideration. He argues that the circuit court erred in denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163112 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion for reconsideration. He argues that the circuit court erred in denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163112 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
filed a motion for sentence modification, asking the court to exercise its discretion to remove
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153816 - 2017-09-21
filed a motion for sentence modification, asking the court to exercise its discretion to remove
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=153816 - 2017-09-21