Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35741 - 35750 of 68502 for did.
Search results 35741 - 35750 of 68502 for did.
[PDF]
State v. Nicholas V. Maiorano
to an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance claim, the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26087 - 2017-09-21
to an evidentiary hearing on his ineffective assistance claim, the trial court did not erroneously exercise its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26087 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Appeal No. 2010AP2514-CR Cir. Ct. No. 2008CF120
. At the time, he was a stranger to the mother of the child, who therefore did not give him any sort
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73854 - 2014-09-15
. At the time, he was a stranger to the mother of the child, who therefore did not give him any sort
/ca/cert/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=73854 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, that there was no evidence that the mother did, in fact, have any sexually explicit material in her home. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102844 - 2017-09-21
, that there was no evidence that the mother did, in fact, have any sexually explicit material in her home. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102844 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
Alternative Program. If he was found not to be eligible for the program or did not participate, Batz would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=437806 - 2021-10-07
Alternative Program. If he was found not to be eligible for the program or did not participate, Batz would
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=437806 - 2021-10-07
COURT OF APPEALS
did not constitute a “new factor” justifying modification. We agree and we affirm the order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49836 - 2010-05-10
did not constitute a “new factor” justifying modification. We agree and we affirm the order. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49836 - 2010-05-10
COURT OF APPEALS
order. ¶6 Dermody argued in her motion for reconsideration that the record did not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
order. ¶6 Dermody argued in her motion for reconsideration that the record did not contain
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108226 - 2014-02-19
Jerome R. Christensen v. City of Racine Police and Fire Commission
that the parties agreed the just cause standard would not apply because the standard did not go into effect until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8003 - 2005-03-31
that the parties agreed the just cause standard would not apply because the standard did not go into effect until
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8003 - 2005-03-31
David T. Lass v. Heritage Mutual Insurance Company
appealed. Because the trial court did not err in its exercise of discretion in dismissing the case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13627 - 2005-03-31
appealed. Because the trial court did not err in its exercise of discretion in dismissing the case, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13627 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
was granted, but he ultimately did not respond to the no-merit report. ¶4 In the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62656 - 2011-04-11
was granted, but he ultimately did not respond to the no-merit report. ¶4 In the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62656 - 2011-04-11
State v. Cheryl C. Britton
, did you see anything what I would construe to be illegal in the building and she said no. I asked her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11173 - 2005-03-31
, did you see anything what I would construe to be illegal in the building and she said no. I asked her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11173 - 2005-03-31