Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35741 - 35750 of 46051 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 35741 - 35750 of 46051 for paternity test paper work.
[PDF]
Rock County Department of Human Services v. Patti S.
verdict. Micaela Broetzmann testified that she had administered four urine tests to Patti over the last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6440 - 2017-09-19
verdict. Micaela Broetzmann testified that she had administered four urine tests to Patti over the last
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6440 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Catina A. McCoy
entails. In Terry [v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)], the Court applied this balancing test to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10784 - 2017-09-20
entails. In Terry [v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968)], the Court applied this balancing test to determine
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10784 - 2017-09-20
State v. James A. Kreutz
then conducted field sobriety tests, which Kreutz performed unsatisfactorily. Kreutz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15178 - 2005-03-31
then conducted field sobriety tests, which Kreutz performed unsatisfactorily. Kreutz
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15178 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Danny L. Peterson
.2d 891. “[T]he ‘manifest injustice’ test is met if the defendant was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20676 - 2017-09-21
.2d 891. “[T]he ‘manifest injustice’ test is met if the defendant was denied the effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20676 - 2017-09-21
State v. Chet Woodward
highway, and without sufficient field test results to warrant continued detention.” At the motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12378 - 2005-03-31
highway, and without sufficient field test results to warrant continued detention.” At the motion hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12378 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Ronald Irvin Ryan
that relevance test. Nos. 2004AP1986 2004AP1987 6 ¶6 Tabor and Ryan also argue that applying 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18127 - 2017-09-21
that relevance test. Nos. 2004AP1986 2004AP1987 6 ¶6 Tabor and Ryan also argue that applying 2003
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18127 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
“The harmless error test ... is focused on ‘whether, assuming that the damaging potential of the cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223974 - 2018-10-25
“The harmless error test ... is focused on ‘whether, assuming that the damaging potential of the cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=223974 - 2018-10-25
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
in the result of the trial that took place. See id. (prejudice is not an outcome determinative test
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107905 - 2017-09-21
in the result of the trial that took place. See id. (prejudice is not an outcome determinative test
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107905 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Travis E. Blanks
of the test because we conclude that Blanks could not have been prejudiced by his trial counsel's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9874 - 2017-09-19
of the test because we conclude that Blanks could not have been prejudiced by his trial counsel's failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9874 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
it was harmless. ¶19 The test for harmless error is “whether there is a reasonable possibility that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85764 - 2012-08-07
it was harmless. ¶19 The test for harmless error is “whether there is a reasonable possibility that the error
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=85764 - 2012-08-07