Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35751 - 35760 of 63750 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35751 - 35760 of 63750 for Motion for joint custody.
[PDF]
State v. William E. Hampton
convictions. The trial court denied Hampton's postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9600 - 2017-09-19
convictions. The trial court denied Hampton's postconviction motion for sentence modification
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9600 - 2017-09-19
State v. Patrick A. Hayden
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Hayden's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8395 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction and an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his plea. Hayden's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8395 - 2005-03-31
State v. Jason Luepke
by one year. He argues that the sentence is excessive and punishes him for prevailing in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2470 - 2005-03-31
by one year. He argues that the sentence is excessive and punishes him for prevailing in his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2470 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. requested the transcripts and circuit court case record. The motion gives no reason for H.V.’s delay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209957 - 2018-03-21
. requested the transcripts and circuit court case record. The motion gives no reason for H.V.’s delay
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=209957 - 2018-03-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Attorney Phillip Brehm has filed a no-merit report seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660055 - 2023-05-23
postconviction motion for sentence modification. Attorney Phillip Brehm has filed a no-merit report seeking
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=660055 - 2023-05-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
an order denying his motion for reconsideration. He argues that the circuit court erred in denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163112 - 2017-09-21
an order denying his motion for reconsideration. He argues that the circuit court erred in denying his
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=163112 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
argued in Riverbank’s summary judgment motion. Nor did Rammer raise this issue at a hearing, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62850 - 2014-09-15
argued in Riverbank’s summary judgment motion. Nor did Rammer raise this issue at a hearing, because
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62850 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
). Their motion was untimely because it was filed after the respondent’s brief had been filed. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29369 - 2007-06-13
). Their motion was untimely because it was filed after the respondent’s brief had been filed. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29369 - 2007-06-13
[PDF]
State v. Jason Luepke
that the sentence is excessive and punishes him for prevailing in his motion for resentencing. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2470 - 2017-09-19
that the sentence is excessive and punishes him for prevailing in his motion for resentencing. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2470 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Kathleen Jensen v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund
-Respondents. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Opinion Filed: June 19, 2001 Submitted on Briefs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17558 - 2017-09-21
-Respondents. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION Opinion Filed: June 19, 2001 Submitted on Briefs
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17558 - 2017-09-21