Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35761 - 35770 of 59277 for SMALL CLAIMS.

[PDF] Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
what she designated as a "notice of circumstances and claim" with the City, pursuant to Wis. Stat
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16940 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
without good cause. Sanctions may include entering judgment or dismissing claims or defenses.” ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122245 - 2014-09-23

Shirley D. Anderson v. City of Milwaukee
filed what she designated as a "notice of circumstances and claim" with the City, pursuant to Wis. Stat
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16908 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
motion for relief. In his postconviction motion, Flynn claimed that his trial counsel was ineffective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36591 - 2009-05-26

COURT OF APPEALS
not performed the home improvement repairs. The jury rejected the Ordings’ claims for breach of express
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=139580 - 2015-04-13

[PDF] Village of Trempealeau v. Mike R. Mikrut
the vehicles back to this location “until they are processed.” He keeps the vehicles until a claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4750 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Dennis R. Fosnow
. § 971.15 (1987-88). The circuit court conducted a hearing regarding Fosnow’s postconviction claim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2148 - 2017-09-19

Juneau County v. Courthouse Employees
the standard of review to be applied in this case. A claim is frivolous when a party or attorney "knew
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17161 - 2005-03-31

CA Blank Order
memory is unclear regarding exactly what happened. He claims that everything is confused in his head
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=121434 - 2014-09-09

State v. Nathan Lalor
a claim that the judgment of commitment must be reversed because the State failed to prove at trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15368 - 2005-03-31