Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35761 - 35770 of 40044 for financial disclosure statement.

State v. Joseph A. Yanske
, all statements given and items seized during this detention are inadmissible. Florida v. Royer, 460
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21053 - 2006-01-25

State v. Brian A. Patterson
that the prosecutor, in his opening statement, violated the trial court’s ruling from the outset. The record, however
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5216 - 2005-03-31

Jefferson County Department of Human Services v. Volonna W.
for this statement is that counsel had received from the district attorney’s office, pursuant to a discovery request
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13213 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Frontsheet
Schlieve has filed an objection to the OLR's statement of costs. Among other things, she argues
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=144545 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Sean M. Daley
but sixteen months after initial statement, “seriously depreciates” recantation’s reliability); Nawrocke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=24775 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] CA Blank Order
to the police officers, photos of the victim’s injuries, recordings of the victim’s statement to police
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=637164 - 2023-03-29

[PDF] State v. Eduardo Jose Trigueros
into the neighborhoods. And that’s exactly what the … Neighborhood Impact Statement describes here. It points out
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17661 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Cornelius Flowers
to statements and the recommendation contained in it. Because the trial court’s finding that Flowers
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5709 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Stephen P. Gautschi
with this statement, we do not agree with the conclusion the State would have us draw from it. As stated above, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16231 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
be incorporated into a court order, we reject the premise. It is not a complete statement of the law
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=132031 - 2017-09-21