Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35761 - 35770 of 63530 for records/1000.
Search results 35761 - 35770 of 63530 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS
. McAdory was released to extended supervision in both matters but the record reflects that his extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140081 - 2015-04-20
. McAdory was released to extended supervision in both matters but the record reflects that his extended
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140081 - 2015-04-20
COURT OF APPEALS
). Our review of the whole record persuades us Sell understood and voluntarily entered the plea. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36676 - 2009-06-09
). Our review of the whole record persuades us Sell understood and voluntarily entered the plea. ¶9
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=36676 - 2009-06-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in denying Donohoo’s administrative appeal. Rather, the court found that the record showed the Board may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218839 - 2018-09-11
in denying Donohoo’s administrative appeal. Rather, the court found that the record showed the Board may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=218839 - 2018-09-11
[PDF]
State v. Steven Claus
. 4 Because the record does not contain a transcript of the suppression hearing, it is unclear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13858 - 2014-09-15
. 4 Because the record does not contain a transcript of the suppression hearing, it is unclear
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13858 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
not apply because the defendant has been deprived of the full examination of the appellate record to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49275 - 2010-04-26
not apply because the defendant has been deprived of the full examination of the appellate record to which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49275 - 2010-04-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. BACKGROUND ¶3 The following facts are taken from the record. This case involves changes in Reindahl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190914 - 2017-09-21
. BACKGROUND ¶3 The following facts are taken from the record. This case involves changes in Reindahl’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=190914 - 2017-09-21
State v. Ashanti D.
testifying.” The trial court then concluded that, “there’s nothing in this record to suggest that [counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10355 - 2005-03-31
testifying.” The trial court then concluded that, “there’s nothing in this record to suggest that [counsel
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10355 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Jameel A. Ali
observed prior to the selection and swearing in of the jury in our deliberation?” Nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9095 - 2017-09-19
observed prior to the selection and swearing in of the jury in our deliberation?” Nothing in the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9095 - 2017-09-19
State v. Jameel A. Ali
in of the jury in our deliberation?” Nothing in the record or the appellate briefs establishes what behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9095 - 2005-03-31
in of the jury in our deliberation?” Nothing in the record or the appellate briefs establishes what behavior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9095 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
payroll records indicate he was not on duty at that time. ¶4 In February 2013, Lelinski filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108345 - 2014-02-24
payroll records indicate he was not on duty at that time. ¶4 In February 2013, Lelinski filed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=108345 - 2014-02-24