Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35771 - 35780 of 83945 for case search.
Search results 35771 - 35780 of 83945 for case search.
Ashland County v. Lisa R.
was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order that included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
was required to prove that, in the preceding CHIPS case, Lisa had received a written order that included
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17747 - 2005-04-18
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
, five days after the time for answering expired. He was then substituted out of the case by order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15019 - 2005-03-31
, five days after the time for answering expired. He was then substituted out of the case by order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15019 - 2005-03-31
State v. Robert J. DeFliger
there was any kind of conversation between them about the case. The court stated that it did not think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
there was any kind of conversation between them about the case. The court stated that it did not think
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2934 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
read a recent case; and (2) his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to timely raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35050 - 2008-12-29
read a recent case; and (2) his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to timely raise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35050 - 2008-12-29
State v. Orbbie Williams
appealed. ΒΆ3 On appeal, we reversed and remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
appealed. ΒΆ3 On appeal, we reversed and remanded the case to the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19806 - 2005-10-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2019-20).1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=436084 - 2021-10-06
Anderson B. Connor v. Sara Connor
, five days after the time for answering expired. He was then substituted out of the case by order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15412 - 2005-03-31
, five days after the time for answering expired. He was then substituted out of the case by order dated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15412 - 2005-03-31
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Robert Glickman
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1758-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 96-1758-D Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17123 - 2005-03-31
Alvar Larson v. City of Elkhorn
be considered. The court further held that the Board in that case would have been acting contrary to law had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2326 - 2005-03-31
be considered. The court further held that the Board in that case would have been acting contrary to law had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2326 - 2005-03-31
State v. John R. Calkins
may not collaterally attack a prior conviction in a subsequent criminal case where the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31
may not collaterally attack a prior conviction in a subsequent criminal case where the prior
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6922 - 2005-03-31