Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35781 - 35790 of 63530 for records/1000.

State v. Christopher Lee Davis
to examine the record to determine whether the exercise of discretion was proper in this case. A court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2445 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Brian J. Coerper
visited Ms. VandenWyngaard at her home and spoke with her. Ms. VandenWyngaard recorded
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16955 - 2017-09-21

State v. Joseph C. Coles
is ambiguous, we will look to the entire record to determine the court's intent. See State v. Brown, 150 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10346 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=840522 - 2024-08-20

[PDF] State v. William M. Schleck
). There should be evidence in the record that discretion was in fact exercised, and the basis of that exercise
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2653 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
defender with him.” After a “[d]iscussion off the record,” the trial court announced: “I will talk
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=76219 - 2012-01-09

Eddie Cannon v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
of their ownership claims. The record offers nothing to suggest that the trial court's finding that Morgan owned
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7768 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to entitle the [defendant] to relief, or presents only conclusory allegations, or if the record conclusively
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=41416 - 2009-09-28

[PDF] NOTICE
record and devotion to civic activities against the severity of the charges, his need for treatment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=46549 - 2014-09-15

State v. D'Juan T. Turner
in nature, or if the record conclusively shows the appellant is not entitled to relief, the trial court may
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7104 - 2005-03-31