Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 51476 for Cost-effective treatments https://simplemedrx.top.

01-12A Amendment of Supreme Court Rules relating to the Lawyer Regulation System (Effective 04-01
of their official duties. Section 12. 21.21 of the Supreme Court Rules is amended to read: 21.21 Cost of lawyer
/sc/scord/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=965 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tatiahanah Marie Miller v. Mauston School District
share of the cost of 4 Effective January 1, 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12689 - 2017-09-21

Tatiahanah Marie Miller v. Mauston School District
] each participating local unit’s prorated share of the cost of cooperative programs and assess[ing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12689 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI 113
of costs totaling $11,763.47. Of that total, $3002.95 represents appellate costs. 9 Effective July 1
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29854 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Kenneth J. Yorgan v. Thomas W. Durkin
was involved in a car accident and received chiropractic treatment from Dr. Yorgan. At some point, Dr
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25397 - 2017-09-21

Kenneth J. Yorgan v. Thomas W. Durkin
chiropractic treatment from Dr. Yorgan. At some point, Dr. Yorgan provided her with a form entitled
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25397 - 2006-06-01

[PDF] State v. Dean A Goehring, Sr.
offender treatment consisted of weekly group therapy sessions with other convicted sex offenders. Over
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11616 - 2017-09-19

State v. Dean A Goehring, Sr.
sexual offender treatment consisted of weekly group therapy sessions with other convicted sex offenders
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11616 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
personality traits. Fuhrer noted that “[i]t is difficult to identify a treatment that would be effective
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=205875 - 2017-12-21

Milwaukee County v. Edward S.
., for an extension of Edward’s commitment, alleging that Edward would continue to benefit from treatment, including
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=24624 - 2006-03-27