Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 6391 for dr.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 6391 for dr.
State v. Paul Matek
. In fact, one of the State’s experts, Dr. Bradley Allen, thought it “inappropriate” to lump all pedophiles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
. In fact, one of the State’s experts, Dr. Bradley Allen, thought it “inappropriate” to lump all pedophiles
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11818 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James Daulton
at Gagetti’s apartment and Dr. Michael Stier testified that the bat could have been used to inflict Gagetti’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7261 - 2017-09-20
at Gagetti’s apartment and Dr. Michael Stier testified that the bat could have been used to inflict Gagetti’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7261 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Susan K. Frenz v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
of Anesthesia. On November 22, 1995, Frenz saw Dr. Joseph F. Davies for paracervical muscle spasms that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12574 - 2017-09-21
of Anesthesia. On November 22, 1995, Frenz saw Dr. Joseph F. Davies for paracervical muscle spasms that had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12574 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
that finding. Both in [the testimony and opinion of Allstate’s expert, Dr. Sridhar Vasudevin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107420 - 2017-09-21
that finding. Both in [the testimony and opinion of Allstate’s expert, Dr. Sridhar Vasudevin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107420 - 2017-09-21
Lincoln County v. April G.
complained of was properly admitted. April’s primary contention is that Cheyenne’s physician, Dr. David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15890 - 2005-03-31
complained of was properly admitted. April’s primary contention is that Cheyenne’s physician, Dr. David
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15890 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald Murtaugh v. State
a separation of his shoulder. He was initially examined at the prison by Dr. Roman Kaplan, who requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6124 - 2017-09-19
a separation of his shoulder. He was initially examined at the prison by Dr. Roman Kaplan, who requested
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6124 - 2017-09-19
State v. Willie C. Simpson
Simpson bases his contention upon the testimony of Dr. Green, who stated that his examination did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4322 - 2005-03-31
Simpson bases his contention upon the testimony of Dr. Green, who stated that his examination did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4322 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Karen A.O.
, 1988, Dr. James Fico, a clinical psychologist, evaluated Karen and concluded that hands-on training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10928 - 2017-09-20
, 1988, Dr. James Fico, a clinical psychologist, evaluated Karen and concluded that hands-on training
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10928 - 2017-09-20
Susan K. Frenz v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development
was the Specialty Coordinator for Sinai’s Department of Anesthesia. On November 22, 1995, Frenz saw Dr. Joseph F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12574 - 2005-03-31
was the Specialty Coordinator for Sinai’s Department of Anesthesia. On November 22, 1995, Frenz saw Dr. Joseph F
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12574 - 2005-03-31
State v. Charles R. C.
that testimony. The defense expert, Dr. Phillip Esplin, apparently opined[2] that there is no identifiable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6975 - 2005-03-31
that testimony. The defense expert, Dr. Phillip Esplin, apparently opined[2] that there is no identifiable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6975 - 2005-03-31