Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 64819 for records.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 64819 for records.
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
not responded. Upon reviewing the entire Record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083398 - 2026-03-04
not responded. Upon reviewing the entire Record and the no-merit report, we conclude that there are no issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1083398 - 2026-03-04
CA Blank Order
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140093 - 2015-04-20
of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140093 - 2015-04-20
Winnebago County v. Paul M. Nigl
record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
record; second, if we were to construe his petition as a direct appeal, he is not entitled to relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6651 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, and the record on appeal is unclear regarding credit for the deposit. We therefore reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
, and the record on appeal is unclear regarding credit for the deposit. We therefore reverse and remand
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=196604 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=707798 - 2023-09-28
CA Blank Order
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111964 - 2014-05-12
with the State’s recommendation. This no-merit appeal follows. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111964 - 2014-05-12
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213860 - 2018-06-06
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213860 - 2018-06-06
State v. Thomas B.
, however, that this discretionary choice by the juvenile court was based on evidence in the record showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20795 - 2005-12-27
, however, that this discretionary choice by the juvenile court was based on evidence in the record showing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20795 - 2005-12-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201344 - 2017-11-07
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=201344 - 2017-11-07
[PDF]
David W. Barrow v. Wayne Watry
in the record only points to one conclusion–the Watrys fabricated their painting claim because Barrow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13025 - 2017-09-21
in the record only points to one conclusion–the Watrys fabricated their painting claim because Barrow
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13025 - 2017-09-21