Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 6139 for sheriff.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 6139 for sheriff.
State v. Joseph P. Hogan
witness at the refusal hearing was Marquette County Deputy Sheriff Shane Heisser, who testified as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17631 - 2005-04-13
witness at the refusal hearing was Marquette County Deputy Sheriff Shane Heisser, who testified as follows
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17631 - 2005-04-13
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED December 28, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
the Columbia County Sheriff’s Department was dispatched to Beecraft’s residence, looking for a third party who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27611 - 2006-12-27
the Columbia County Sheriff’s Department was dispatched to Beecraft’s residence, looking for a third party who
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27611 - 2006-12-27
COURT OF APPEALS
and affirm. ¶2 Daniels was a seventy-two-year-old jailer for the Taylor County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58349 - 2010-12-27
and affirm. ¶2 Daniels was a seventy-two-year-old jailer for the Taylor County Sheriff’s Department
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58349 - 2010-12-27
CA Blank Order
then asked her to forgive him and give him another chance. Deputy Sheriff Ron Ripley testified he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109725 - 2014-03-31
then asked her to forgive him and give him another chance. Deputy Sheriff Ron Ripley testified he
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=109725 - 2014-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sheriff’s department. ¶4 Decker appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Decker challenges the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91968 - 2013-01-23
sheriff’s department. ¶4 Decker appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Decker challenges the circuit court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=91968 - 2013-01-23
State v. Kurt J. Doerr
that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s deputies were bound by the constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13709 - 2005-03-31
that once he invoked his right to counsel, the sheriff’s deputies were bound by the constitution
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13709 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darryl E. Pierce
of six color photos provided by the Racine County Sheriff’s Department. Steinbrecher immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3800 - 2005-03-31
of six color photos provided by the Racine County Sheriff’s Department. Steinbrecher immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3800 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
sheriff took about the incident. I stand by that report.” Dezotell also indicated that he considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72951 - 2011-10-31
sheriff took about the incident. I stand by that report.” Dezotell also indicated that he considered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72951 - 2011-10-31
County of Jefferson v. Mark L. Guttenberg
. At approximately 3:00 a.m. on October 7, 1995, Jefferson County sheriff’s deputies and a state trooper were advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2005-03-31
. At approximately 3:00 a.m. on October 7, 1995, Jefferson County sheriff’s deputies and a state trooper were advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Office of Lawyer Regulation v. James F. Blask
, and released him only when a sheriff’s deputy appeared in response to a call for assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17252 - 2017-09-21
, and released him only when a sheriff’s deputy appeared in response to a call for assistance
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17252 - 2017-09-21