Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 6188 for sheriff.
Search results 3581 - 3590 of 6188 for sheriff.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
detectives from the Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office—Detective Steven Wall and Detective Alex Martinez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229383 - 2018-12-11
detectives from the Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Office—Detective Steven Wall and Detective Alex Martinez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=229383 - 2018-12-11
Lacrosse County v. Mark P.
Crosse County Sheriff's Department, testified that Mark admitted that he sexually abused his two step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10164 - 2005-03-31
Crosse County Sheriff's Department, testified that Mark admitted that he sexually abused his two step
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10164 - 2005-03-31
State v. Sandra L. Barrette
of § 943.20(1)(a), Stats. This warrant is supported by the sworn complaint of Richland County Sheriff's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12918 - 2005-03-31
of § 943.20(1)(a), Stats. This warrant is supported by the sworn complaint of Richland County Sheriff's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12918 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
drunk driving conviction. ¶2 Sheriff’s Deputy Steven S. Wimmer was specifically assigned to patrol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62146 - 2014-09-15
drunk driving conviction. ¶2 Sheriff’s Deputy Steven S. Wimmer was specifically assigned to patrol
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=62146 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
County of Winnebago v. David M. Meza
Sheriff’s Department. Meza was subsequently charged with the crimes listed above. ¶4 The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2538 - 2017-09-19
Sheriff’s Department. Meza was subsequently charged with the crimes listed above. ¶4 The United
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2538 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Sheila K. LaFortune
The facts are undisputed. At approximately 12:15 a.m. on January 11, 2002, the Brown County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6999 - 2017-09-20
The facts are undisputed. At approximately 12:15 a.m. on January 11, 2002, the Brown County Sheriff’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6999 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
was identified by a deputy sheriff as being behind the wheel of one of the two cars involved in a traffic
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207660 - 2018-01-24
was identified by a deputy sheriff as being behind the wheel of one of the two cars involved in a traffic
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=207660 - 2018-01-24
[PDF]
State v. Darryl E. Pierce
of six color photos provided by the Racine County Sheriff’s Department. Steinbrecher immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3800 - 2017-09-20
of six color photos provided by the Racine County Sheriff’s Department. Steinbrecher immediately
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3800 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
or possessed to the county sheriff’s department. ¶4 Decker appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Decker challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91968 - 2014-09-15
or possessed to the county sheriff’s department. ¶4 Decker appeals. DISCUSSION ¶5 Decker challenges
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=91968 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Dwight Gustafson
from the Pierce County Sheriff’s Department dispatcher that an off-duty deputy had called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2152 - 2017-09-19
from the Pierce County Sheriff’s Department dispatcher that an off-duty deputy had called
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2152 - 2017-09-19