Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 35801 - 35810 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
Search results 35801 - 35810 of 63731 for Motion for joint custody.
State v. Paul Delao Quiroz
and an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Quiroz argues that he should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4062 - 2005-03-31
and an order denying his postconviction motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Quiroz argues that he should have
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4062 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
responsibility. After the close of evidence, the circuit court granted the State’s motion for a directed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699514 - 2023-09-06
responsibility. After the close of evidence, the circuit court granted the State’s motion for a directed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=699514 - 2023-09-06
[PDF]
Hunzinger Construction Company v. SCS of Wisconsin, Inc.
with Hunzinger. Hunzinger, St. Paul and USF&G filed a motion in opposition, arguing that they were entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7362 - 2017-09-20
with Hunzinger. Hunzinger, St. Paul and USF&G filed a motion in opposition, arguing that they were entitled
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7362 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
. Background ¶2 Kissack was originally charged with drunk driving offenses in 2005. He filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44953 - 2014-09-15
. Background ¶2 Kissack was originally charged with drunk driving offenses in 2005. He filed a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=44953 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas D. Gogin
and from No(s). 00-2055-CR 2 an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2857 - 2017-09-19
and from No(s). 00-2055-CR 2 an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2857 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and, therefore, it had no duty to defend CSR. The circuit court granted Navigators’ motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49926 - 2010-05-11
and, therefore, it had no duty to defend CSR. The circuit court granted Navigators’ motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49926 - 2010-05-11
COURT OF APPEALS
filed a motion to suppress certain evidence, and the court held an evidentiary hearing on his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44953 - 2009-12-22
filed a motion to suppress certain evidence, and the court held an evidentiary hearing on his motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44953 - 2009-12-22
2007 WI App 32
. Gee appeals the order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new reconfinement hearing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27939 - 2007-02-27
. Gee appeals the order denying his postconviction motion seeking a new reconfinement hearing. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27939 - 2007-02-27
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
),1 postconviction motion. We affirm. ¶2 The procedural background of this case is convoluted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465710 - 2021-12-21
),1 postconviction motion. We affirm. ¶2 The procedural background of this case is convoluted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=465710 - 2021-12-21
State v. David Beck
not. ¶4 The trial commenced on March 18, 2002. Beck’s pretrial motion for a change of venue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5710 - 2005-03-31
not. ¶4 The trial commenced on March 18, 2002. Beck’s pretrial motion for a change of venue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5710 - 2005-03-31